Showing 307 of 307 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
get_key_vals($I,$f=null,$cg=0){global$e;if(!is_object($f))$f=$e;$K=array();$f->timeout=$cg;$J=$f->query($I);$f->timeout=0;if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_row())$K[$L[0]]=$L[1];}return$K;}function
get_rows($I,$f=null,$k="<p class='error'>"){global$e;$eb=(is_object($f)?$f:$e);$K=array();$J=$eb->query($I);if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_assoc())$K[]=$L;}elseif(!$J&&!is_object($f)&&$k&&defined("PAGE_HEADER"))echo$k.error()."\n";return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
get_key_vals($I,$g=null,$ke=0){global$f;if(!is_object($g))$g=$f;$K=array();$g->timeout=$ke;$J=$g->query($I);$g->timeout=0;if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_row())$K[$L[0]]=$L[1];}return$K;}function
get_rows($I,$g=null,$k="<p class='error'>"){global$f;$Sa=(is_object($g)?$g:$f);$K=array();$J=$Sa->query($I);if(is_object($J)){while($L=$J->fetch_assoc())$K[]=$L;}elseif(!$J&&!is_object($g)&&$k&&defined("PAGE_HEADER"))echo$k.error()."\n";return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function navigation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
true;}function
navigation($Ic){global$ca;echo'<h1>
',$this->name(),' <span class="version">',$ca,'</span>
<a href="https://www.adminer.org/editor/#download" target="_blank" id="version">',(version_compare($ca,$_COOKIE["adminer_version"])<0?h($_COOKIE["adminer_version"]):""),'</a>
</h1>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function process_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
',(support("comment")?"<td".($cb?"":" class='hidden'")."><input name='fields[$t][comment]' value='".h($l["comment"])."' maxlength='".($e->server_info>=5.5?1024:255)."'>":"");}echo"<td>",(support("move_col")?"<input type='image' class='icon' name='add[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=plus.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='+' title='".'Add next'."' onclick='return !editingAddRow(this, 1);'> "."<input type='image' class='icon' name='up[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=up.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='^' title='".'Move up'."'> "."<input type='image' class='icon' name='down[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=down.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='v' title='".'Move down'."'> ":""),($he==""||support("drop_col")?"<input type='image' class='icon' name='drop_col[$t]' src='".h(preg_replace("~\\?.*~","",ME))."?file=cross.gif&version=4.2.5&driver=mysql' alt='x' title='".'Remove'."' onclick=\"return !editingRemoveRow(this, 'fields\$1[field]');\">":""),"\n";}}function
process_fields(&$m){ksort($m);$Od=0;if($_POST["up"]){$fd=0;foreach($m
as$z=>$l){if(key($_POST["up"])==$z){unset($m[$z]);array_splice($m,$fd,0,array($l));break;}if(isset($l["field"]))$fd=$Od;$Od++;}}elseif($_POST["down"]){$uc=false;foreach($m
as$z=>$l){if(isset($l["field"])&&$uc){unset($m[key($_POST["down"])]);array_splice($m,$Od,0,array($uc));break;}if(key($_POST["down"])==$z)$uc=$l;$Od++;}}elseif($_POST["add"]){$m=array_values($m);array_splice($m,key($_POST["add"]),0,array(array()));}elseif(!$_POST["drop_col"])return
false;return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
send(){fseek($this->handler,0);fpassthru($this->handler);fclose($this->handler);}}$Vb="'(?:''|[^'\\\\]|\\\\.)*'";$Oc="IN|OUT|INOUT";if(isset($_GET["select"])&&($_POST["edit"]||$_POST["clone"])&&!$_POST["save"])$_GET["edit"]=$_GET["select"];if(isset($_GET["callf"]))$_GET["call"]=$_GET["callf"];if(isset($_GET["function"]))$_GET["procedure"]=$_GET["function"];if(isset($_GET["download"])){$a=$_GET["download"];$m=fields($a);header("Content-Type: application/octet-stream");header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".friendly_url("$a-".implode("_",$_GET["where"])).".".friendly_url($_GET["field"]));$N=array(idf_escape($_GET["field"]));$J=$j->select($a,$N,array(where($_GET,$m)),$N);$L=($J?$J->fetch_row():array());echo$L[0];exit;}elseif(isset($_GET["table"])){$a=$_GET["table"];$m=fields($a);if(!$m)$k=error();$R=table_status1($a,true);page_header(($m&&is_view($R)?'View':'Table').": ".h($a),$k);$b->selectLinks($R);$bb=$R["Comment"];if($bb!="")echo"<p>".'Comment'.": ".h($bb)."\n";if($m){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Column'."<td>".'Type'.(support("comment")?"<td>".'Comment':"")."</thead>\n";foreach($m
as$l){echo"<tr".odd()."><th>".h($l["field"]),"<td><span title='".h($l["collation"])."'>".h($l["full_type"])."</span>",($l["null"]?" <i>NULL</i>":""),($l["auto_increment"]?" <i>".'Auto Increment'."</i>":""),(isset($l["default"])?" <span title='".'Default value'."'>[<b>".h($l["default"])."</b>]</span>":""),(support("comment")?"<td>".nbsp($l["comment"]):""),"\n";}echo"</table>\n";}if(!is_view($R)){if(support("indexes")){echo"<h3 id='indexes'>".'Indexes'."</h3>\n";$w=indexes($a);if($w){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($w
as$F=>$v){ksort($v["columns"]);$Ie=array();foreach($v["columns"]as$z=>$X)$Ie[]="<i>".h($X)."</i>".($v["lengths"][$z]?"(".$v["lengths"][$z].")":"").($v["descs"][$z]?" DESC":"");echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'><th>$v[type]<td>".implode(", ",$Ie)."\n";}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'indexes='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Alter indexes'."</a>\n";}if(fk_support($R)){echo"<h3 id='foreign-keys'>".'Foreign keys'."</h3>\n";$o=foreign_keys($a);if($o){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n","<thead><tr><th>".'Source'."<td>".'Target'."<td>".'ON DELETE'."<td>".'ON UPDATE'."<td> </thead>\n";foreach($o
as$F=>$n){echo"<tr title='".h($F)."'>","<th><i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["source"]))."</i>","<td><a href='".h($n["db"]!=""?preg_replace('~db=[^&]*~',"db=".urlencode($n["db"]),ME):($n["ns"]!=""?preg_replace('~ns=[^&]*~',"ns=".urlencode($n["ns"]),ME):ME))."table=".urlencode($n["table"])."'>".($n["db"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["db"])."</b>.":"").($n["ns"]!=""?"<b>".h($n["ns"])."</b>.":"").h($n["table"])."</a>","(<i>".implode("</i>, <i>",array_map('h',$n["target"]))."</i>)","<td>".nbsp($n["on_delete"])."\n","<td>".nbsp($n["on_update"])."\n",'<td><a href="'.h(ME.'foreign='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($F)).'">'.'Alter'.'</a>';}echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'foreign='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add foreign key'."</a>\n";}}if(support(is_view($R)?"view_trigger":"trigger")){echo"<h3 id='triggers'>".'Triggers'."</h3>\n";$qg=triggers($a);if($qg){echo"<table cellspacing='0'>\n";foreach($qg
as$z=>$X)echo"<tr valign='top'><td>".h($X[0])."<td>".h($X[1])."<th>".h($z)."<td><a href='".h(ME.'trigger='.urlencode($a).'&name='.urlencode($z))."'>".'Alter'."</a>\n";echo"</table>\n";}echo'<p class="links"><a href="'.h(ME).'trigger='.urlencode($a).'">'.'Add trigger'."</a>\n";}}elseif(isset($_GET["schema"])){page_header('Database schema',"",array(),h(DB.($_GET["ns"]?".$_GET[ns]":"")));$Qf=array();$Rf=array();$ea=($_GET["schema"]?$_GET["schema"]:$_COOKIE["adminer_schema-".str_replace(".","_",DB)]);preg_match_all('~([^:]+):([-0-9.]+)x([-0-9.]+)(_|$)~',$ea,$rd,PREG_SET_ORDER);foreach($rd
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Adminer Module based on Ghost Module
*
* You may not change or alter any portion of this comment or credits
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$x=>$V){if($N&&!in_array(idf_escape($x),$N))continue;$oa=convert_field($m[$x]);if($oa)$K.=", $oa AS ".idf_escape($x);}return$K;}function
cookie($D,$W,$zc=2592000){global$aa;$ed=array($D,(preg_match("~\n~",$W)?"":$W),($zc?time()+$zc:0),preg_replace('~\\?.*~','',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]),"",$aa);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,'5.2.0')>=0)$ed[]=true;return
call_user_func_array('setcookie',$ed);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
as$z=>$X){if($N&&!in_array(idf_escape($z),$N))continue;$ua=convert_field($m[$z]);if($ua)$K.=", $ua AS ".idf_escape($z);}return$K;}function
cookie($F,$Y,$nd=2592000){global$ba;$pe=array($F,(preg_match("~\n~",$Y)?"":$Y),($nd?time()+$nd:0),preg_replace('~\\?.*~','',$_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"]),"",$ba);if(version_compare(PHP_VERSION,'5.2.0')>=0)$pe[]=true;return
call_user_func_array('setcookie',$pe);}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Adminer Module based on Ghost Module
*
* You may not change or alter any portion of this comment or credits
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/**
* Adminer Module based on Ghost Module
*
* You may not change or alter any portion of this comment or credits
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search_tables(){global$b,$f;$_GET["where"][0]["op"]="LIKE %%";$_GET["where"][0]["val"]=$_POST["query"];$Qb=false;foreach(table_status('',true)as$R=>$S){$D=$b->tableName($S);if(isset($S["Engine"])&&$D!=""&&(!$_POST["tables"]||in_array($R,$_POST["tables"]))){$J=$f->query("SELECT".limit("1 FROM ".table($R)," WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$b->selectSearchProcess(fields($R),array())),1));if(!$J||$J->fetch_row()){if(!$Qb){echo"<ul>\n";$Qb=true;}echo"<li>".($J?"<a href='".h(ME."select=".urlencode($R)."&where[0][op]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["op"])."&where[0][val]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["val"]))."'>$D</a>\n":"$D: <span class='error'>".error()."</span>\n");}}}echo($Qb?"</ul>":"<p class='message'>".'No tables.')."\n";}function
dump_headers($fc,$Jc=false){global$b;$K=$b->dumpHeaders($fc,$Jc);$bd=$_POST["output"];if($bd!="text")header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".$b->dumpFilename($fc).".$K".($bd!="file"&&!preg_match('~[^0-9a-z]~',$bd)?".$bd":""));session_write_close();ob_flush();flush();return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 140.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search_tables(){global$b,$e;$_GET["where"][0]["op"]="LIKE %%";$_GET["where"][0]["val"]=$_POST["query"];$uc=false;foreach(table_status('',true)as$Q=>$R){$F=$b->tableName($R);if(isset($R["Engine"])&&$F!=""&&(!$_POST["tables"]||in_array($Q,$_POST["tables"]))){$J=$e->query("SELECT".limit("1 FROM ".table($Q)," WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$b->selectSearchProcess(fields($Q),array())),1));if(!$J||$J->fetch_row()){if(!$uc){echo"<ul>\n";$uc=true;}echo"<li>".($J?"<a href='".h(ME."select=".urlencode($Q)."&where[0][op]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["op"])."&where[0][val]=".urlencode($_GET["where"][0]["val"]))."'>$F</a>\n":"$F: <span class='error'>".error()."</span>\n");}}}echo($uc?"</ul>":"<p class='message'>".'No tables.')."\n";}function
dump_headers($Ic,$Ed=false){global$b;$K=$b->dumpHeaders($Ic,$Ed);$me=$_POST["output"];if($me!="text")header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".$b->dumpFilename($Ic).".$K".($me!="file"&&!preg_match('~[^0-9a-z]~',$me)?".$me":""));session_write_close();ob_flush();flush();return$K;}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 140.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method foreignKeys
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function foreignKeys($table) {
if (DRIVER == 'server' && DB == 'mysql') {
switch ($table) {
case 'columns_priv': return array(array('table' => 'user', 'source' => array('Host', 'User'), 'target' => array('Host', 'User')));
case 'db': return array(array('table' => 'user', 'source' => array('Host', 'User'), 'target' => array('Host', 'User')));
Method create_ajax_script
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function create_ajax_script()
{
global $linenumber, $foffset, $totalqueries, $delaypersession, $curfilename, $delimiter;
?>
Function dumpTable
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dumpDatabase($i){}function
dumpTable($Q,$If,$Yc=0){if($_POST["format"]!="sql"){echo"\xef\xbb\xbf";if($If)dump_csv(array_keys(fields($Q)));}else{if($Yc==2){$m=array();foreach(fields($Q)as$F=>$l)$m[]=idf_escape($F)." $l[full_type]";$g="CREATE TABLE ".table($Q)." (".implode(", ",$m).")";}else$g=create_sql($Q,$_POST["auto_increment"]);set_utf8mb4($g);if($If&&$g){if($If=="DROP+CREATE"||$Yc==1)echo"DROP ".($Yc==2?"VIEW":"TABLE")." IF EXISTS ".table($Q).";\n";if($Yc==1)$g=remove_definer($g);echo"$g;\n\n";}}}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
addcslashes($Gf,"\r\n'\\/");}function
json_row($z,$X=null){static$pc=true;if($pc)echo"{";if($z!=""){echo($pc?"":",")."\n\t\"".addcslashes($z,"\r\n\"\\/").'": '.($X!==null?'"'.addcslashes($X,"\r\n\"\\/").'"':'undefined');$pc=false;}else{echo"\n}\n";$pc=true;}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
addcslashes($Q,"\r\n'\\/");}function
json_row($x,$V=null){static$Ib=true;if($Ib)echo"{";if($x!=""){echo($Ib?"":",")."\n\t\"".addcslashes($x,"\r\n\"\\/").'": '.($V!==null?'"'.addcslashes($V,"\r\n\"\\/").'"':'undefined');$Ib=false;}else{echo"\n}\n";$Ib=true;}}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 136.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function select_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
md5(uniqid(mt_rand(),true));}function
select_value($X,$A,$l,$ag){global$b,$ba;if(is_array($X)){$K="";foreach($X
as$Zc=>$W)$K.="<tr>".($X!=array_values($X)?"<th>".h($Zc):"")."<td>".select_value($W,$A,$l,$ag);return"<table cellspacing='0'>$K</table>";}if(!$A)$A=$b->selectLink($X,$l);if($A===null){if(is_mail($X))$A="mailto:$X";if($Oe=is_url($X))$A=(($Oe=="http"&&$ba)||preg_match('~WebKit~i',$_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])?$X:"https://www.adminer.org/redirect/?url=".urlencode($X));}$K=$b->editVal($X,$l);if($K!==null){if($K==="")$K=" ";elseif(!is_utf8($K))$K="\0";elseif($ag!=""&&is_shortable($l))$K=shorten_utf8($K,max(0,+$ag));else$K=h($K);}return$b->selectVal($K,$A,$l,$X);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function select_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
md5(uniqid(mt_rand(),true));}function
select_value($V,$z,$l,$he){global$b,$aa;if(is_array($V)){$K="";foreach($V
as$w=>$U)$K.="<tr>".($V!=array_values($V)?"<th>".h($w):"")."<td>".select_value($U,$z,$l,$he);return"<table cellspacing='0'>$K</table>";}if(!$z)$z=$b->selectLink($V,$l);if($z===null){if(is_mail($V))$z="mailto:$V";if($qd=is_url($V))$z=(($qd=="http"&&$aa)||preg_match('~WebKit~i',$_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])?$V:"https://www.adminer.org/redirect/?url=".urlencode($V));}$K=$b->editVal($V,$l);if($K!==null){if($K==="")$K=" ";elseif(!is_utf8($K))$K="\0";elseif($he!=""&&is_shortable($l))$K=shorten_utf8($K,max(0,+$he));else$K=h($K);}return$b->selectVal($K,$z,$l,$V);}function
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
preg_match('~char|text|lob|geometry|point|linestring|polygon|string~',$l["type"]);}function
count_rows($R,$Y,$u,$p){global$v;$I=" FROM ".table($R).($Y?" WHERE ".implode(" AND ",$Y):"");return($u&&($v=="sql"||count($p)==1)?"SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ".implode(", ",$p).")$I":"SELECT COUNT(*)".($u?" FROM (SELECT 1$I$Ub) x":$I));}function
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 133.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76