Showing 2,846 of 2,846 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!empty($end_time)) {
$timezone = ($GLOBALS['xoopsUser'] instanceof \XoopsUser) ? $GLOBALS['xoopsUser']->getVar('timezone') : null;
// $poll_obj->setVar("end_time", userTimeToServerTime(strtotime($end_time), $timezone));
//Hack by irmtfan
$poll_obj->setVar('end_time', userTimeToServerTime(method_exists('XoopsLocal', 'strtotime') ? XoopsLocal::strtotime($end_time) : strtotime($end_time), $timezone));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!empty($end_time)) {
$timezone = ($GLOBALS['xoopsUser'] instanceof \XoopsUser) ? $GLOBALS['xoopsUser']->getVar('timezone') : null;
// $poll_obj->setVar("end_time", userTimeToServerTime(strtotime($end_time), $timezone));
//Hack by irmtfan
$poll_obj->setVar('end_time', userTimeToServerTime(method_exists('XoopsLocal', 'strtotime') ? XoopsLocal::strtotime($end_time) : strtotime($end_time), $timezone));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (max) { //if max was set
if (max === 0) {
max = new Date();
} else {
max = new Date(max);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (min) { //if min was set
if (min === 0) {
min = new Date();
} else {
min = new Date(min);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method mailResults
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function mailResults(mixed $pollObj = null): array
{
$criteria = new \CriteriaCompo();
$criteria->add(new \Criteria('end_time', \time(), '<')); // expired polls
$criteria->add(new \Criteria('mail_status', Constants::POLL_NOT_MAILED, '=')); // email not previously sent
Method getFormFeedback
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getFormFeedback($action = false): XoopsThemeForm
{
if (!$action) {
$action = $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'];
}
Function approve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function approve(&$post, $force = false)
{
if (empty($post)) {
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method orderBlock
has 14 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
array $bid,
array $oldtitle,
array $oldside,
array $oldweight,
array $oldvisible,
Function displayPostEdit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function displayPostEdit()
{
global $myts;
if (empty($GLOBALS['xoopsModuleConfig']['recordedit_timelimit'])) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method updateBlock
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function updateBlock(int $bid, string $btitle, string $bside, string $bweight, string $bvisible, string $bcachetime, ?array $bmodule, ?array $options, ?array $groups)
{
$myblock = new \XoopsBlock($bid);
$myblock->setVar('title', $btitle);
$myblock->setVar('weight', $bweight);
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (tp_inst._defaults.minDateTime !== undefined && tp_inst._defaults.minDateTime instanceof Date) {
tp_inst._defaults.minDate = new Date(tp_inst._defaults.minDateTime.getTime());
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (tp_inst._defaults.maxDate !== undefined && tp_inst._defaults.maxDate instanceof Date) {
tp_inst._defaults.maxDateTime = new Date(tp_inst._defaults.maxDate.getTime());
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (tp_inst._defaults.maxDateTime !== undefined && tp_inst._defaults.maxDateTime instanceof Date) {
tp_inst._defaults.maxDate = new Date(tp_inst._defaults.maxDateTime.getTime());
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method renderOptionFormTray
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function renderOptionFormTray(int $pid = 0): \XoopsFormElementTray
{
\xoops_load('xoopsformloader');
$pid = (int)$pid;
$barcolor_array = \XoopsLists::getImgListAsArray($GLOBALS['xoops']->path('modules/xoopspoll/assets/images/colorbars/'));
Method checkVerModule
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function checkVerModule(\Xmf\Module\Helper $helper, ?string $source = 'github', ?string $default = 'master'): ?array
{
$moduleDirName = \basename(\dirname(__DIR__, 2));
$moduleDirNameUpper = \mb_strtoupper($moduleDirName);
$update = '';
Function getPostBody
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function &getPostBody()
{
global $xoopsConfig, $xoopsUser, $myts;
/** @var Xoopspoll\Helper $helper */
$helper = Xoopspoll\Helper::getInstance();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function approve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function approve(&$post, $force = false)
{
if (empty($post)) {
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handleActions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function handleActions(BlockData $blockData)
{
$moduleDirNameUpper = \mb_strtoupper(Helper::getInstance()->getDirname());
$bid = Request::getInt('bid', 0);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getPostBody
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function &getPostBody()
{
global $myts;
$GLOBALS['xoopsModuleConfig'] = newbb_load_config(); // irmtfan load all newbb configs - newbb config in blocks activated in some modules like profile
// mod_loadFunctions('user', 'newbb');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isBlockCloned
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function isBlockCloned(int $bid, string $bside, string $bweight, string $bvisible, string $bcachetime, ?array $bmodule, ?array $options, ?array $groups, bool $redirect = true)
{
\xoops_loadLanguage('admin', 'system');
\xoops_loadLanguage('admin/blocksadmin', 'system');
\xoops_loadLanguage('admin/groups', 'system');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"