Showing 1,501 of 1,501 total issues
Method add_level2_card_and_more_tax
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_level2_card_and_more_tax(xml, options = {})
if (level2 = options[:level_2_data])
xml.tag! :PCardRequestorName, byte_limit(level2[:requestor_name], 38) if level2[:requestor_name]
xml.tag! :PCardLocalTaxRate, byte_limit(level2[:local_tax_rate], 5) if level2[:local_tax_rate]
# Canadian Merchants Only
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
CURRENCY_CODES = {
'AED' => '784',
'ARS' => '32',
'AUD' => '36',
'BRL' => '986',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
CURRENCY_CODES = {
'AED' => '784',
'ARS' => '32',
'AUD' => '36',
'BRL' => '986',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method fields
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fields(action)
# Gateway expects fields in fixed order below.
case action
when 'PAYMENT', 'PREAUTH'
%i[
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
post[:card][:address_line1] = address[:address1] if address[:address1]
post[:card][:address_line2] = address[:address2] if address[:address2]
post[:card][:address_country] = address[:country] if address[:country]
post[:card][:address_zip] = address[:zip] if address[:zip]
post[:card][:address_state] = address[:state] if address[:state]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
post[:card][:addressLine1] = address[:address1] if address[:address1]
post[:card][:addressLine2] = address[:address2] if address[:address2]
post[:card][:addressCountry] = address[:country] if address[:country]
post[:card][:addressZip] = address[:zip] if address[:zip]
post[:card][:addressState] = address[:state] if address[:state]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method add_payment_method
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_payment_method(post, payment_method, options, key = :source)
# the key = :destination when this method is called in def credit
post[key] = {}
case payment_method
when NetworkTokenizationCreditCard
Method build_create_profile_request
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_create_profile_request(options)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new :indent => 2
xml.tag! 'CreateRecurringPaymentsProfileReq', 'xmlns' => PAYPAL_NAMESPACE do
xml.tag! 'CreateRecurringPaymentsProfileRequest', 'xmlns:n2' => EBAY_NAMESPACE do
xml.tag! 'n2:Version', API_VERSION
Method build_merchant_data
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_merchant_data(xml, data, options = {})
# See https://sis-t.redsys.es:25443/sis/services/SerClsWSEntradaV2/wsdl/SerClsWSEntradaV2.wsdl
# (which results from calling #webservice_url + '?WSDL', https://sis-t.redsys.es:25443/sis/services/SerClsWSEntradaV2?WSDL)
xml.DATOSENTRADA do
# Basic elements
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
post[:address] = address[:address1] if address[:address1]
post[:address2] = address[:address2] if address[:address2]
post[:city] = address[:city] if address[:city]
post[:region] = address[:state] if address[:state]
post[:country] = address[:country] if address[:country]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
post[:fraud_remote_addr] = options[:ip] if options[:ip]
post[:fraud_http_accept] = options[:fraud_http_accept] if options[:fraud_http_accept]
post[:fraud_http_accept_language] = options[:fraud_http_accept_language] if options[:fraud_http_accept_language]
post[:fraud_http_accept_encoding] = options[:fraud_http_accept_encoding] if options[:fraud_http_accept_encoding]
post[:fraud_http_accept_charset] = options[:fraud_http_accept_charset] if options[:fraud_http_accept_charset]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method build_new_order_xml
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_new_order_xml(action, money, payment_source, parameters = {})
requires!(parameters, :order_id)
@use_secondary_url = parameters[:use_secondary_url] if parameters[:use_secondary_url]
xml = xml_envelope
xml.tag! :Request do
Method post_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_data(params)
return nil unless params
params.map do |key, value|
next if value.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_xml_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_xml_request(action, data)
xml = Builder::XmlMarkup.new indent: 2
xml.Request(version: '1.0') do
xml.Header do
xml.Security(sender: @options[:sender], type: 'MERCHANT')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_extra_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_extra_options(post, options)
extra = {}
extra[:ecm] = '32' if options[:recurring]
extra[:name] = options[:merchant] if options[:merchant]
extra[:location] = options[:merchant_location] if options[:merchant_location]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_customer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_customer(xml, options)
customer = options[:customer]
return unless customer
xml.tag!('customer') do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_network_tokenization_card
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_network_tokenization_card(post, payment, options)
if options.dig(:stored_credential, :initiator) == 'merchant'
post[:paymentInformation][:tokenizedCard] = {
number: payment.number,
expirationMonth: payment.month,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_address
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_address(post, options)
if address = options[:shipping_address]
post[:deliveryAddress] = {}
post[:deliveryAddress][:street] = options[:address_override] == true ? address[:address2] : address[:address1] || 'NA'
post[:deliveryAddress][:houseNumberOrName] = options[:address_override] == true ? address[:address1] : address[:address2] || 'NA'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_extra_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_extra_data(post, payment, options)
post[:telephoneNumber] = (options[:billing_address][:phone_number] if options.dig(:billing_address, :phone_number)) || (options[:billing_address][:phone] if options.dig(:billing_address, :phone)) || ''
post[:selectedBrand] = options[:selected_brand] if options[:selected_brand] && !post[:selectedBrand]
post[:deliveryDate] = options[:delivery_date] if options[:delivery_date]
post[:merchantOrderReference] = options[:merchant_order_reference] if options[:merchant_order_reference]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_customer_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_customer_data(post, options)
post[:d1] = options[:ip] || '127.0.0.1'
if (billing_address = options[:billing_address])
post[:c5] = billing_address[:address1] if billing_address[:address1]
post[:c7] = billing_address[:city] if billing_address[:city]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"