Showing 1,501 of 1,501 total issues
Method add_shipping_contact_info
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_shipping_contact_info(doc, payment_method, options)
if address = options[:shipping_address]
# https://developers.bluesnap.com/v8976-XML/docs/shipping-contact-info
doc.send('first-name', payment_method.first_name)
doc.send('last-name', payment_method.last_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_intent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_intent(money, payment_method, options = {})
MultiResponse.run do |r|
if payment_method.is_a?(NetworkTokenizationCreditCard) && digital_wallet_payment_method?(payment_method) && options[:new_ap_gp_route] != true
r.process { tokenize_apple_google(payment_method, options) }
payment_method = (r.params['token']['id']) if r.success?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_data(params)
return nil unless params
params.map do |key, value|
next if value.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_payment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_payment(xml, money, payment, options)
requires!(options.merge!({ money: money }), :currency, :money)
xml.tag!('v1:Payment') do
xml.tag!('v1:HostedDataID', payment) if payment&.is_a?(String)
xml.tag!('v1:HostedDataStoreID', options[:hosted_data_store_id]) if options[:hosted_data_store_id]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_installments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_installments(xml, options)
return unless %i[installment_total_count installment_total_amount installment_plan_type first_installment_date installment_annual_interest_rate installment_grace_period_duration].any? { |gsf| options.include?(gsf) }
xml.tag! 'installment' do
xml.tag!('totalCount', options[:installment_total_count]) if options[:installment_total_count]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
self.supported_countries = %w(CA CL CO DO SV PE PT VI AU HK IN ID JP MY NZ PH SG KR TW TH VN AD AT BE BA BG HR CY CZ DK EE FI FR GE DE GI GR GL HU IS IE IL IT LV LI LT LU MK MT MD MC ME NL GB NO PL RO RU SM SK SI ZA ES SE CH TR VA)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
self.supported_countries = %w(AD AE AT AU BD BE BG BN CA CH CY CZ DE DK EE EG ES FI FR GB
GI GR HK HU ID IE IL IM IN IS IT JO KW LB LI LK LT LU LV MC
MT MU MV MX MY NL NO NZ OM PH PL PT QA RO SA SE SG SI SK SM
TR TT UM US VA VN ZA)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if address = options[:billing_address] || options[:address]
post[:firstname] = address[:first_name]
post[:lastname] = address[:last_name]
post[:address1] = address[:address1]
post[:address2] = address[:address2]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
self.supported_countries = %w(AD AE AT AU BD BE BG BN CA CH CY CZ DE DK EE EG ES FI FR GB
GI GR HK HU ID IE IL IM IN IS IT JO KW LB LI LK LT LU LV MC
MT MU MV MX MY NL NO NZ OM PH PL PT QA RO SA SE SG SI SK SM
TR TT UM US VA VN ZA)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (billing_address = (options[:billing_address] || options[:address]))
post[:ci_companyname] = billing_address[:company]
post[:ci_billaddr1] = billing_address[:address1]
post[:ci_billaddr2] = billing_address[:address2]
post[:ci_billcity] = billing_address[:city]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method request
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, body, headers = {})
request_start = Process.clock_gettime(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
headers = headers.dup
headers['connection'] ||= 'close'
Method add_creditcard
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_creditcard(post, creditcard, options, use_sources = false)
card = {}
if emv_payment?(creditcard)
add_emv_creditcard(post, creditcard.icc_data)
post[:card][:read_method] = 'contactless' if creditcard.read_method == 'contactless'
Method test_gateways
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def test_gateways
success, failed, missing, errored, disabled = [], [], [], [], []
puts "Verifying #{@gateways.count} SSL certificates\n\n"
Method scrub
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scrub(transcript)
ret_transcript = transcript
auth_origin = ret_transcript[/<authorization>(.*?)<\/authorization>/, 1]
unless auth_origin.nil?
auth_origin = auth_origin.gsub('\n', '')
Method create_intent
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_intent(money, payment_method, options = {})
MultiResponse.run do |r|
if payment_method.is_a?(NetworkTokenizationCreditCard) && digital_wallet_payment_method?(payment_method) && options[:new_ap_gp_route] != true
r.process { tokenize_apple_google(payment_method, options) }
payment_method = (r.params['token']['id']) if r.success?
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
return unless options[:merchant_descriptor] ||
options[:user_po] ||
options[:taxable] ||
options[:reference_data_code] ||
options[:invoice_number] ||
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
xml.address do
xml.ShippingAddress1 shipping_address[:address1] if shipping_address[:address1]
xml.ShippingAddress2 shipping_address[:address2] if shipping_address[:address2]
xml.ShippingCity shipping_address[:city] if shipping_address[:city]
xml.ShippingState shipping_address[:state] if shipping_address[:state]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def add_three_d_secure(xml, three_d_secure)
xml.tag!('v1:CreditCard3DSecure') do
xml.tag!('v1:AuthenticationValue', three_d_secure[:cavv]) if three_d_secure[:cavv]
xml.tag!('v1:XID', three_d_secure[:xid]) if three_d_secure[:xid]
xml.tag!('v1:Secure3D2TransactionStatus', three_d_secure[:directory_response_status]) if three_d_secure[:directory_response_status]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def add_address(xml, address)
xml.tag!('v1:Address') do
xml.tag!('v1:Address1', address[:address1]) if address[:address1]
xml.tag!('v1:Address2', address[:address2]) if address[:address2]
xml.tag!('v1:Zip', address[:zip]) if address[:zip]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
xml.address do
xml.BillingAddress1 address[:address1] if address[:address1]
xml.BillingAddress2 address[:address2] if address[:address2]
xml.BillingCity address[:city] if address[:city]
xml.BillingState address[:state] if address[:state]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76