Showing 296 of 296 total issues
Class Sorting
has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Sorting
include Enumerable
include ActiveScaffold::OrmChecks
attr_accessor :constraint_columns, :sorting_by_primary_key # sorting_by_primary_key enabled by default for postgres
Method action_link_html_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def action_link_html_options(link, record, options)
link_id = get_action_link_id(link, record)
html_options = link.html_options.merge(class: [link.html_options[:class], link.action.to_s].compact.join(' '))
html_options[:link] = action_link_text(link, record, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function in_place_editor_field_clicked
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
in_place_editor_field_clicked: function(span) {
// test editor is open
if (typeof(span.data('editInPlace')) === 'undefined') {
var options = {show_buttons: true,
hover_class: 'hover',
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
increment_record_count: function(scaffold) {
// increment the last record count, firsts record count are in nested lists
if (typeof(scaffold) == 'string') scaffold = '#' + scaffold;
scaffold = jQuery(scaffold);
var count = scaffold.find('span.active-scaffold-records').last();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 98.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
decrement_record_count: function(scaffold) {
// decrement the last record count, firsts record count are in nested lists
if (typeof(scaffold) == 'string') scaffold = '#' + scaffold;
scaffold = jQuery(scaffold);
var count = scaffold.find('span.active-scaffold-records').last();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 98.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method active_scaffold_search_select
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_search_select(column, html_options, options = {}, ui_options: column.options)
record = html_options.delete(:object)
associated = html_options.delete :value
if include_null_comparators?(column, ui_options: ui_options)
range_opts = html_options.slice(:name, :id)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method display_action_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def display_action_link(link, content, record, options)
if content
html_classes = hover_via_click? ? 'hover_click ' : ''
if options[:level].zero?
html_classes << 'action_group'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method link_for_association
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def link_for_association(column, options = {})
return if (controller = active_scaffold_controller_for_column(column, options)).nil?
options.reverse_merge! position: :after, type: :member, column: column,
controller: (controller == :polymorph ? controller : "/#{controller.controller_path}")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clause
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clause(grouped_columns = nil)
return nil if sorts_by_method? || default_sorting?
# unless the sorting is by method, create the sql string
order = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class ActionLink
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ActionLink
NO_OPTIONS = {}.freeze
# provides a quick way to set any property of the object from a hash
def initialize(action, options = {})
Method active_scaffold
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold(model_id = nil, &block)
extend Prefixes
# initialize bridges here
ActiveScaffold::Bridges.run_all
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method authorized_for?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def authorized_for?(options = {})
raise ArgumentError, "unknown crud type #{options[:crud_type]}" if options[:crud_type] && %i[create read update delete].exclude?(options[:crud_type])
not_authorized_reason = ActiveRecordPermissions.not_authorized_reason
# collect other possibly-related methods that actually exist
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_input_radio
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_input_radio(column, html_options, ui_options: column.options)
record = html_options[:object]
html_options.merge!(ui_options[:html_options] || {})
options =
if column.association
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_search_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_search_for(column, options = nil)
options ||= active_scaffold_search_options(column)
search_columns = active_scaffold_config.field_search.columns.visible_columns_names
options = update_columns_options(column, nil, options, form_columns: search_columns, url_params: {form_action: :field_search})
record = options[:object]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method condition_for_column
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def condition_for_column(column, value, text_search, session)
like_pattern = like_pattern(text_search)
value = value.with_indifferent_access if value.is_a? Hash
column_method = "condition_for_#{column.name}_column"
if respond_to?(column_method)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method association_options_find
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def association_options_find(association, conditions = nil, klass = nil, record = nil)
if klass.nil? && association.polymorphic?
class_name = record.send(association.foreign_type) if association.belongs_to?
return [] if class_name.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_action_link_action
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_action_link_action(render_action = :action_update, crud_type_or_security_options = nil)
if request.get? || request.head?
# someone has disabled javascript, we have to show confirmation form first
@record = find_if_allowed(params[:id], :read) if params[:id]
respond_to_action(:action_confirmation)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_render_subform_column
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_render_subform_column(column, scope, crud_type, readonly, add_class = false, record = nil) # rubocop:disable Metrics/ParameterLists
if add_class
col_class = []
col_class << 'required' if column.required?(action_for_validation?(record))
col_class << column.css_class unless column.css_class.nil? || column.css_class.is_a?(Proc)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_controller_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.active_scaffold_controller_for(klass, controller_namespace = '::')
error_message = []
class_names = [klass.to_s, klass.to_s.demodulize].map { |k| k.underscore.pluralize }.map { |k| [k, k.singularize] }.flatten
[controller_namespace, ''].each do |namespace|
class_names.each do |controller_name|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method active_scaffold_human_condition_select
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def active_scaffold_human_condition_select(column, associated)
attribute = column.label
if associated.is_a?(Hash)
return active_scaffold_human_condition_range(column, associated) unless associated['opt'] == '='
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"