Showing 922 of 922 total issues
Method merge!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 270 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge!
logger.tagged("Merge ##{merge.id}") do
referential.switch do
Chouette::ChecksumUpdater.new(referential).update
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File netex_generic.rb
has 1692 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Export::NetexGeneric < Export::Base
include LocalExportSupport
option :profile, enumerize: %w[none french european idfm/iboo idfm/icar idfm/full], default: :none
option :duration
File gtfs.rb
has 1375 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Import::Gtfs < Import::Base
include LocalImportSupport
after_commit :update_main_resource_status, on: [:create, :update]
File gtfs.rb
has 1351 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Export::Gtfs < Export::Base
include LocalExportSupport
option :period, default_value: 'all_periods', enumerize: %w[all_periods only_next_days static_day_period]
option :duration
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<div className='row'>
<div className='col-lg-12'>
<div className='subform'>
<div className='nested-head'>
<div className='wrapper'>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 571.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{ this.props.stopAreasConstraints && <div className='row'>
<div className='col-lg-12'>
<div className='subform'>
<div className='nested-head'>
<div className='wrapper'>
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 571.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File netex_generic.rb
has 1101 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Import
class NetexGeneric < Import::Base
include LocalImportSupport
include Imports::WithoutReferentialSupport
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<div>
<div className={'form-group date ' + (modal.modalProps.error ? ' has-error' : '')}>
<div className="form-inline">
<select value={formatNumber(modal.modalProps.begin.day)} onChange={(e) => onUpdatePeriodForm(e, 'begin', 'day', modal.modalProps)} id="q_validity_period_begin_gteq_3i" className="date required form-control">
{makeDaysOptions(modal.modalProps.begin.day)}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 341.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<div>
<div className={'form-group date ' + (modal.modalProps.error ? ' has-error' : '')}>
<div className="form-inline">
<select value={formatNumber(modal.modalProps.end.day)} onChange={(e) => onUpdatePeriodForm(e, 'end', 'day', modal.modalProps)} id="q_validity_period_end_gteq_3i" className="date required form-control">
{makeDaysOptions(modal.modalProps.end.day)}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 341.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
actions
has 94 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const actions = {
enterEditMode: () => ({
type: "ENTER_EDIT_MODE"
}),
exitEditMode: () => ({
Class Referential
has 92 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Referential < ApplicationModel
prepend ReferentialSaveWithLock
include DataFormatEnumerations
include ObjectidFormatterSupport
Method merge!
has 310 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge!
logger.tagged("Merge ##{merge.id}") do
referential.switch do
Chouette::ChecksumUpdater.new(referential).update
end
File base.rb
has 664 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Search
class Base
extend ActiveModel::Naming
extend Enumerize
File referential.rb
has 647 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module ReferentialSaveWithLock
def save(options = {})
super(options)
rescue ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid => e
Chouette::Safe.capture "Referential #{name} with slug #{slug} save failed", e
Class StopArea
has 76 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class StopArea < Chouette::ActiveRecord
include StopAreaReferentialSupport
has_metadata
include ProjectionFields
Function modal
has 279 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function modal(state = {}, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'OPEN_CONFIRM_MODAL':
$('#ConfirmModal').modal('show')
return _.assign({}, state, {
File index.js
has 606 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { batchActions } from '../batch'
const actions = {
enterEditMode: () => ({
type: "ENTER_EDIT_MODE"
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<div className='flex time filter_menu-item mr-5'>
<label className='control-label time'>{I18n.t("vehicle_journeys.form.departure_range.start")}</label>
<div className='form-inline'>
<div className='input-group time'>
<input
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 238.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<div className='flex time filter_menu-item'>
<label className='control-label time'>{I18n.t("vehicle_journeys.form.departure_range.end")}</label>
<div className='form-inline'>
<div className='input-group time'>
<input
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 238.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method tr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 63 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tr item, columns, selectable, links, overhead, model_name, action
klass = "#{model_name} #{model_name}-#{item.id}"
content_tag :tr, class: klass do
bcont = []
if selectable
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"