Showing 62 of 69 total issues
Function newClient
has 568 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newClient() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createClient,
Read: readClient,
File resource_auth0_client.go
has 872 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package auth0
import (
"net/http"
"strconv"
Function newTenant
has 231 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newTenant() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createTenant,
Read: readTenant,
File structure_auth0_connection.go
has 676 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package auth0
import (
"log"
Function newLogStream
has 166 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newLogStream() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createLogStream,
Read: readLogStream,
Function newAction
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newAction() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createAction,
Read: readAction,
Function newUser
has 99 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newUser() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createUser,
Read: readUser,
Update: updateUser,
Function newResourceServer
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newResourceServer() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createResourceServer,
Read: readResourceServer,
Function newGuardian
has 91 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newGuardian() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createGuardian,
Read: readGuardian,
Function newEmail
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newEmail() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createEmail,
Read: readEmail,
Function Provider
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func Provider() *schema.Provider {
provider := &schema.Provider{
Schema: map[string]*schema.Schema{
"domain": {
Type: schema.TypeString,
Function newBranding
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newBranding() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createBranding,
Read: readBranding,
Update: updateBranding,
Function newOrganization
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newOrganization() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createOrganization,
Read: readOrganization,
Function readGuardian
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func readGuardian(d *schema.ResourceData, m interface{}) error {
api := m.(*management.Management)
mt, err := api.Guardian.MultiFactor.Phone.MessageTypes()
if err != nil {
return err
Function newEmailTemplate
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newEmailTemplate() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createEmailTemplate,
Read: readEmailTemplate,
Function newHook
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newHook() *schema.Resource {
return &schema.Resource{
Create: createHook,
Read: readHook,
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func deleteRule(d *schema.ResourceData, m interface{}) error {
api := m.(*management.Management)
err := api.Rule.Delete(d.Id())
if err != nil {
if mErr, ok := err.(management.Error); ok {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func deleteHook(d *schema.ResourceData, m interface{}) error {
api := m.(*management.Management)
err := api.Hook.Delete(d.Id())
if err != nil {
if mErr, ok := err.(management.Error); ok {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func deleteClientGrant(d *schema.ResourceData, m interface{}) error {
api := m.(*management.Management)
err := api.ClientGrant.Delete(d.Id())
if err != nil {
if mErr, ok := err.(management.Error); ok {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func deleteClient(d *schema.ResourceData, m interface{}) error {
api := m.(*management.Management)
err := api.Client.Delete(d.Id())
if err != nil {
if mErr, ok := err.(management.Error); ok {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76