Showing 21 of 29 total issues
Method reconciliation.Reconcile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func (r *reconciliation) Reconcile() error {
completed := false
for !completed {
startTimeTotal := time.Now()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reconciliation.retrieveResources
has 87 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func (r *reconciliation) retrieveResources() error {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(r.ctx)
defer cancel()
var oc types.ObjectChannel
Method mgr.reconciliationForService
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func (m mgr) reconciliationForService(ctx context.Context, clusterName string, svc *v1.Service, nodes []*v1.Node) (reconciliation.Reconciliation, []net.IP, error) {
var ports map[string]reconciliation.Port
var servers []reconciliation.Server
var externalAddresses []net.IP
Method reconciliation.Reconcile
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func (r *reconciliation) Reconcile() error {
completed := false
for !completed {
startTimeTotal := time.Now()
Function New
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
ctx context.Context,
apiClient api.API,
resourceNameSuffix string,
loadBalancerIdentifier string,
Method mgr.reconciliationForService
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func (m mgr) reconciliationForService(ctx context.Context, clusterName string, svc *v1.Service, nodes []*v1.Node) (reconciliation.Reconciliation, []net.IP, error) {
var ports map[string]reconciliation.Port
var servers []reconciliation.Server
var externalAddresses []net.IP
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reconciliation.retrieveResources
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Confirmed
func (r *reconciliation) retrieveResources() error {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(r.ctx)
defer cancel()
var oc types.ObjectChannel
Method reconciliation.retrieveResources
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func (r *reconciliation) retrieveResources() error {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(r.ctx)
defer cancel()
var oc types.ObjectChannel
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
frontendResourceTypeIdentifier: func(identifier string) (err error) {
frontend := &lbaasv1.Frontend{Identifier: identifier}
if err = r.api.Get(ctx, frontend); err == nil && frontend.LoadBalancer.Identifier == r.lb.Identifier {
r.frontends = append(r.frontends, frontend)
r.sortObjectIntoStateArray(frontend)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
backendResourceTypeIdentifier: func(identifier string) (err error) {
backend := &lbaasv1.Backend{Identifier: identifier}
if err = r.api.Get(ctx, backend); err == nil && backend.LoadBalancer.Identifier == r.lb.Identifier {
r.backends = append(r.backends, backend)
r.sortObjectIntoStateArray(backend)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function mergeReconStatus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func mergeReconStatus(status []map[string][]uint16) map[string][]uint16 {
addressPortReturnedCount := make(map[string]map[uint16]int)
// first track number of status having a address-port-combination
for _, s := range status {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reconciliation.Reconcile
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Confirmed
func (r *reconciliation) Reconcile() error {
completed := false
for !completed {
startTimeTotal := time.Now()
Function New
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Confirmed
func New(config *configuration.ProviderConfig, logger logr.Logger, k8sClient kubernetes.Interface, apiClient api.API, legacyClient client.Client, providerMetrics metrics.ProviderMetrics) (cloudprovider.LoadBalancer, error) {
Method mgr.reconciliationForService
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Confirmed
func (m mgr) reconciliationForService(ctx context.Context, clusterName string, svc *v1.Service, nodes []*v1.Node) (reconciliation.Reconciliation, []net.IP, error) {
var ports map[string]reconciliation.Port
var servers []reconciliation.Server
var externalAddresses []net.IP
Function newPrefix
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newPrefix(ctx context.Context, apiclient api.API, ipamClient ipam.API, identifier string, autoDiscoveryName *string) (*prefix, error) {
Method instanceManager.InstanceExists
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Confirmed
func (i *instanceManager) InstanceExists(ctx context.Context, node *v1.Node) (bool, error) {
if i.lastUnauthorizedOrForbiddenInstanceExistCall.Add(time.Minute).After(time.Now()) {
return false, utils.ErrUnauthorizedForbiddenBackoff
}
Method reconciliation.ReconcileCheck
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r *reconciliation) ReconcileCheck() ([]types.Object, []types.Object, error) {
if err := r.retrieveState(); err != nil {
return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("error retrieving current state for reconciliation: %w", err)
}
2: cannot find package "github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig" in any of: Open
"github.com/kelseyhightower/envconfig"
- Exclude checks
XXX found Confirmed
// XXX: replace this with IPAM address allocation logic once we can add and remove LoadBalancer IPs
- Exclude checks
XXX found Confirmed
// XXX: assumes a node has one internal and one external IP, does funny things when a nodes has multiple of a given type
- Exclude checks