Showing 90 of 90 total issues
Function primary
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
primary: function() {
var primary;
if (this.expect('(')) {
primary = this.filterChain();
this.consume(')');
Function object
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
object: function() {
var keys = [], valueFns = [];
if (this.peekToken().text !== '}') {
do {
if (this.peek('}')) {
Function readNumber
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
readNumber: function() {
var number = '';
var start = this.index;
while (this.index < this.text.length) {
var ch = lowercase(this.text.charAt(this.index));
Function scopeDescriptor
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function scopeDescriptor (elt, scope) {
var val,
theseTypes = [],
noDataDefault = 'scope.$id=' + scope.$id,
type;
Function filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
filter: function(inputFn) {
var fn = this.$filter(this.consume().text);
var argsFn;
var args;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getterFn
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getterFn(path, options, fullExp) {
var expensiveChecks = options.expensiveChecks;
var getterFnCache = (expensiveChecks ? getterFnCacheExpensive : getterFnCacheDefault);
var fn = getterFnCache[path];
if (fn) return fn;
Function filter
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
filter: function(inputFn) {
var fn = this.$filter(this.consume().text);
var argsFn;
var args;
Function compile
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$delegate[0].compile = function(element, attrs, transclude) {
var linkFn = originalCompileFn.apply(this, arguments);
return function ngEventHandler(scope, element, attrs) {
var boundFuncs = getFunctionNames(attrs[ngEventAttrName]);
Function forEach
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function forEach(obj, iterator, context) {
var key, length;
if (obj) {
if (isFunction(obj)) {
for (key in obj) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
describe('angularHint', function() {
it('should warn if ng-hint is called with unknown options', function() {
browser.get('exclude-wrong-module-name/');
expect(consoleText())
.toContain('Angular Hint: General; Warning; Module ngHintExcludeWrongModuleName could not be found;');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
describe('angularHint', function() {
it('should warn if ng-hint is called with unknown options', function() {
browser.get('include-wrong-module-name/');
expect(consoleText())
.toBe('Angular Hint: General; Warning; Module ngHintWrongModuleName could not be found;');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(doms) {
var bothFound,
ngViewFound,
elem,
isElemName,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ensureSafeObject
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ensureSafeObject(obj, fullExpression) {
// nifty check if obj is Function that is fast and works across iframes and other contexts
if (obj) {
if (obj.constructor === obj) {
throw $parseMinErr('isecfn',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cspSafeGetterFn
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function cspSafeGetterFn(key0, key1, key2, key3, key4, fullExp, expensiveChecks) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
iterator.call(context, obj[key], key, obj);
}
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (isObject(source[key])) {
stackSource.push(source[key]);
stackDest.push(result);
}
Function arrayDeclaration
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
arrayDeclaration: function() {
var elementFns = [];
if (this.peekToken().text !== ']') {
do {
if (this.peek(']')) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (isRegExp(o1) && isRegExp(o2)) {
return o1.toString() == o2.toString();
} else {
if (isScope(o1) || isScope(o2) || isWindow(o1) || isWindow(o2) || isArray(o2)) return false;
keySet = {};
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!isDate(o2)) return false;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (isPrimitive || key in obj) {
iterator.call(context, obj[key], key, obj);
}