Showing 93 of 93 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _convert_to_larger(f, t, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj) {
assert(f >= 2);
assert(t >= 2);
assert(f < t);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 217.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _convert_to_smaller(f, t, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj) {
assert(f >= 2);
assert(t >= 2);
assert(f > t);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 217.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _extended_euclidean_algorithm_loop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _extended_euclidean_algorithm_loop(
r,
R0,
R1,
S0,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _extended_euclidean_algorithm_loop
has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _extended_euclidean_algorithm_loop(
r,
R0,
R1,
S0,
Function _convert_dc
has 95 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _convert_dc(
size_small_block,
f,
t,
a,
Function _idivmod_dc
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _idivmod_dc(X, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj, c, ci, cj) {
assert(X >= 2);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
assert(bi >= 0 && bj <= b.length);
assert(ci >= 0 && cj <= c.length);
Function _divmod
has 13 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _divmod(r, D, Di, Dj, d, di, dj, Q, Qi, Qj, R, Ri, Rj) {
Function _convert_dc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _convert_dc(
size_small_block,
f,
t,
a,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _convert_to_larger_slow
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _convert_to_larger_slow(f, t, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj) {
assert(f >= 2);
assert(f <= t);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
assert(bi >= 0 && bj <= b.length);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _imod_schoolbook_large_divisor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _imod_schoolbook_large_divisor(
r,
a,
ai,
aj,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _idivmod_schoolbook_large_divisor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _idivmod_schoolbook_large_divisor(
r,
a,
ai,
aj,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _karatsuba
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _karatsuba(r, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj, c, ci, cj) {
assert(r >= 2);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
assert(bi >= 0 && bj <= b.length);
assert(ci >= 0 && cj <= c.length);
Function _convert_to_larger_slow
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _convert_to_larger_slow(f, t, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj) {
assert(f >= 2);
assert(f <= t);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
assert(bi >= 0 && bj <= b.length);
Function _pow_double
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _pow_double(r, x, a, ai, aj, c, ci, cj) {
assert(r >= 2);
assert(x >= 0);
assert(ai >= 0 && aj <= a.length);
assert(ci >= 0 && cj <= c.length);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const _q = Math.min(r - 1, Math.floor((a[ai] * r + a[ai + 1]) / b[bi]));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
let _q = Math.min(r - 1, Math.floor((a[ai] * r + a[ai + 1]) / b[bi]));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _idivmod_dc
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _idivmod_dc(X, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj, c, ci, cj) {
Function _idivmod_dc_32
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _idivmod_dc_32(r, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj, c, ci, cj) {
Function add
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function add(r, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj, c, ci, cj) {
Function _mul
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function _mul(r, a, ai, aj, b, bi, bj, c, ci, cj) {