Sign upLogin

arttor/helmify

View on GitHub
Star
pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage
D
61%

Method deployment.Process has 83 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (d deployment) Process(appMeta helmify.AppMetadata, obj *unstructured.Unstructured) (bool, helmify.Template, error) {
    if obj.GroupVersionKind() != deploymentGVC {
        return false, nil, nil
    }
    depl := appsv1.Deployment{}
Severity: Major
Found in pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method deployment.Process has 13 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
    Open

    func (d deployment) Process(appMeta helmify.AppMetadata, obj *unstructured.Unstructured) (bool, helmify.Template, error) {
    if obj.GroupVersionKind() != deploymentGVC {
        return false, nil, nil
    }
    depl := appsv1.Deployment{}
    Severity: Major
    Found in pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go - About 1 hr to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func processReplicas(name string, deployment *appsv1.Deployment, values *helmify.Values) (string, error) {
    if deployment.Spec.Replicas == nil {
        return "", nil
    }
    replicasTpl, err := values.Add(int64(*deployment.Spec.Replicas), name, "replicas")
      Severity: Major
      Found in pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go on lines 172..186

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 175.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func processRevisionHistoryLimit(name string, deployment *appsv1.Deployment, values *helmify.Values) (string, error) {
    if deployment.Spec.RevisionHistoryLimit == nil {
        return "", nil
    }
    revisionHistoryLimitTpl, err := values.Add(int64(*deployment.Spec.RevisionHistoryLimit), name, "revisionHistoryLimit")
      Severity: Major
      Found in pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      pkg/processor/deployment/deployment.go on lines 156..170

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 175.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status