awesome-print/awesome_print

View on GitHub

Showing 387 of 387 total issues

Perceived complexity for format is too high. [13/7]
Open

      def format
        vars = variables.map do |var|
          property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
          accessor = if object.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
            object.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Method format has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def format
        vars = variables.map do |var|
          property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
          accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
            struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/formatters/struct_formatter.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Assignment Branch Condition size for align is too high. [20.22/15]
Open

      def align(value, width)
        if options[:multiline]
          if options[:indent] > 0
            value.rjust(width)
          elsif options[:indent] == 0

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Cyclomatic complexity for method_tuple is too high. [11/6]
Open

      def method_tuple(method)
        if method.respond_to?(:parameters) # Ruby 1.9.2+
          # See http://readruby.chengguangnan.com/methods#method-objects-parameters
          # (mirror: http://archive.is/XguCA#selection-3381.1-3381.11)
          args = method.parameters.inject([]) do |arr, (type, name)|

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Perceived complexity for format is too high. [12/7]
Open

      def format
        vars = variables.map do |var|
          property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
          accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
            struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Method has too many lines. [14/10]
Open

    def cast_with_mongo_mapper(object, type)
      apply_default_mongo_mapper_options
      cast = cast_without_mongo_mapper(object, type)

      if defined?(::MongoMapper::Document)

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Method has too many lines. [14/10]
Open

    def awesome_active_record_instance(object)
      return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash)
      return awesome_object(object) if @options[:raw]

      data = if object.class.column_names != object.attributes.keys

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Assignment Branch Condition size for awesome_ripple_document_instance is too high. [19.1/15]
Open

    def awesome_ripple_document_instance(object)
      return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash)
      return awesome_object(object) if @options[:raw]
      exclude_assoc = @options[:exclude_assoc] or @options[:exclude_associations]

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/ext/ripple.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Method has too many lines. [14/10]
Open

    def awesome_ripple_document_instance(object)
      return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash)
      return awesome_object(object) if @options[:raw]
      exclude_assoc = @options[:exclude_assoc] or @options[:exclude_associations]

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/ext/ripple.rb by rubocop

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Method has too many lines. [14/10]
Open

      def limited(data, width, is_hash = false)
        limit = get_limit_size
        if data.length <= limit
          data
        else

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_mongoid is too high. [9/6]
Open

    def cast_with_mongoid(object, type)
      cast = cast_without_mongoid(object, type)
      if defined?(::Mongoid::Document)
        if object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Mongoid::Document)
          cast = :mongoid_class
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/ext/mongoid.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Perceived complexity for cast_with_mongoid is too high. [10/7]
Open

    def cast_with_mongoid(object, type)
      cast = cast_without_mongoid(object, type)
      if defined?(::Mongoid::Document)
        if object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Mongoid::Document)
          cast = :mongoid_class
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/ext/mongoid.rb by rubocop

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Method has too many lines. [13/10]
Open

    def awesome_mongo_mapper_class(object)
      return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash) || !object.respond_to?(:keys)

      data = object.keys.sort.inject(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash.new) do |hash, c|
        hash[c.first] = (c.last.type || 'undefined').to_s.underscore.intern

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Cyclomatic complexity for format is too high. [9/6]
Open

      def format
        vars = variables.map do |var|
          property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
          accessor = if object.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
            object.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Perceived complexity for method_tuple is too high. [10/7]
Open

      def method_tuple(method)
        if method.respond_to?(:parameters) # Ruby 1.9.2+
          # See http://readruby.chengguangnan.com/methods#method-objects-parameters
          # (mirror: http://archive.is/XguCA#selection-3381.1-3381.11)
          args = method.parameters.inject([]) do |arr, (type, name)|

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for convert_to_hash is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def convert_to_hash(object)
      return nil if has_method_accessor?(object)
      return nil if !object.respond_to?(:to_hash) || object.method(:to_hash).arity != 0

      # ActionController::Parameters will raise if they are not yet permitted
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/formatter.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_active_record is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def cast_with_active_record(object, type)
      cast = cast_without_active_record(object, type)
      return cast if !defined?(::ActiveRecord::Base)

      if object.is_a?(::ActiveRecord::Base)

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_sequel is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def cast_with_sequel(object, type)
      cast = cast_without_sequel(object, type)
      if defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(::Sequel::Model)
        cast = :sequel_document
      elsif defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Sequel::Model)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/ext/sequel.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Perceived complexity for cast_with_sequel is too high. [9/7]
Open

    def cast_with_sequel(object, type)
      cast = cast_without_sequel(object, type)
      if defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(::Sequel::Model)
        cast = :sequel_document
      elsif defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Sequel::Model)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/awesome_print/ext/sequel.rb by rubocop

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_mongo_mapper is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def cast_with_mongo_mapper(object, type)
      apply_default_mongo_mapper_options
      cast = cast_without_mongo_mapper(object, type)

      if defined?(::MongoMapper::Document)

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language