Showing 387 of 387 total issues
Perceived complexity for format is too high. [13/7] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if object.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
object.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method format
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Assignment Branch Condition size for align is too high. [20.22/15] Open
def align(value, width)
if options[:multiline]
if options[:indent] > 0
value.rjust(width)
elsif options[:indent] == 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Cyclomatic complexity for method_tuple is too high. [11/6] Open
def method_tuple(method)
if method.respond_to?(:parameters) # Ruby 1.9.2+
# See http://readruby.chengguangnan.com/methods#method-objects-parameters
# (mirror: http://archive.is/XguCA#selection-3381.1-3381.11)
args = method.parameters.inject([]) do |arr, (type, name)|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for format is too high. [12/7] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if struct.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
struct.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def cast_with_mongo_mapper(object, type)
apply_default_mongo_mapper_options
cast = cast_without_mongo_mapper(object, type)
if defined?(::MongoMapper::Document)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def awesome_active_record_instance(object)
return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash)
return awesome_object(object) if @options[:raw]
data = if object.class.column_names != object.attributes.keys
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for awesome_ripple_document_instance is too high. [19.1/15] Open
def awesome_ripple_document_instance(object)
return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash)
return awesome_object(object) if @options[:raw]
exclude_assoc = @options[:exclude_assoc] or @options[:exclude_associations]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def awesome_ripple_document_instance(object)
return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash)
return awesome_object(object) if @options[:raw]
exclude_assoc = @options[:exclude_assoc] or @options[:exclude_associations]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def limited(data, width, is_hash = false)
limit = get_limit_size
if data.length <= limit
data
else
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_mongoid is too high. [9/6] Open
def cast_with_mongoid(object, type)
cast = cast_without_mongoid(object, type)
if defined?(::Mongoid::Document)
if object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Mongoid::Document)
cast = :mongoid_class
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for cast_with_mongoid is too high. [10/7] Open
def cast_with_mongoid(object, type)
cast = cast_without_mongoid(object, type)
if defined?(::Mongoid::Document)
if object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Mongoid::Document)
cast = :mongoid_class
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [13/10] Open
def awesome_mongo_mapper_class(object)
return object.inspect if !defined?(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash) || !object.respond_to?(:keys)
data = object.keys.sort.inject(::ActiveSupport::OrderedHash.new) do |hash, c|
hash[c.first] = (c.last.type || 'undefined').to_s.underscore.intern
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for format is too high. [9/6] Open
def format
vars = variables.map do |var|
property = var.to_s[1..-1].to_sym # to_s because of some monkey patching done by Puppet.
accessor = if object.respond_to?(:"#{property}=")
object.respond_to?(property) ? :accessor : :writer
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for method_tuple is too high. [10/7] Open
def method_tuple(method)
if method.respond_to?(:parameters) # Ruby 1.9.2+
# See http://readruby.chengguangnan.com/methods#method-objects-parameters
# (mirror: http://archive.is/XguCA#selection-3381.1-3381.11)
args = method.parameters.inject([]) do |arr, (type, name)|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Cyclomatic complexity for convert_to_hash is too high. [8/6] Open
def convert_to_hash(object)
return nil if has_method_accessor?(object)
return nil if !object.respond_to?(:to_hash) || object.method(:to_hash).arity != 0
# ActionController::Parameters will raise if they are not yet permitted
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_active_record is too high. [8/6] Open
def cast_with_active_record(object, type)
cast = cast_without_active_record(object, type)
return cast if !defined?(::ActiveRecord::Base)
if object.is_a?(::ActiveRecord::Base)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_sequel is too high. [8/6] Open
def cast_with_sequel(object, type)
cast = cast_without_sequel(object, type)
if defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(::Sequel::Model)
cast = :sequel_document
elsif defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Sequel::Model)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for cast_with_sequel is too high. [9/7] Open
def cast_with_sequel(object, type)
cast = cast_without_sequel(object, type)
if defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(::Sequel::Model)
cast = :sequel_document
elsif defined?(::Sequel::Model) && object.is_a?(Class) && object.ancestors.include?(::Sequel::Model)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Cyclomatic complexity for cast_with_mongo_mapper is too high. [8/6] Open
def cast_with_mongo_mapper(object, type)
apply_default_mongo_mapper_options
cast = cast_without_mongo_mapper(object, type)
if defined?(::MongoMapper::Document)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.