Showing 150 of 150 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
cur = elem.nodeType === 1 && ( elem.className ?
( " " + elem.className + " " ).replace( rclass, " " ) :
""
);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( s.crossDomain == null ) {
parts = rurl.exec( s.url.toLowerCase() );
s.crossDomain = !!( parts &&
( parts[ 1 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 1 ] || parts[ 2 ] !== ajaxLocParts[ 2 ] ||
( parts[ 3 ] || ( parts[ 1 ] === "http:" ? 80 : 443 ) ) !=Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( matcher[ expando ] ) {
// Find the next relative operator (if any) for proper handling
j = ++i;
for ( ; j < len; j++ ) {
if ( Expr.relative[ tokens[j].type ] ) {Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( !jQuery.support.opacity ) {
jQuery.cssHooks.opacity = {
get: function( elem, computed ) {
// IE uses filters for opacity
return ropacity.test( (computed && elem.currentStyle ? elem.currentStyle.filter : elem.style.filter) || "" ) ?Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( (!id || !cache[id] || (!pvt && !cache[id].data)) && getByName && data === undefined ) {
return;
}Function CHILD has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, argument, first, last ) {Function add has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data, selector ) {Function on has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
on: function( types, selector, data, fn, /*INTERNAL*/ one ) {Function condense has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function condense( unmatched, map, filter, context, xml ) {Function augmentWidthOrHeight has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function augmentWidthOrHeight( elem, name, extra, isBorderBox, styles ) {Function superMatcher has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
superMatcher = function( seed, context, xml, results, expandContext ) {Function remove has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, selector, mappedTypes ) {Function Tween has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Tween( elem, options, prop, end, easing ) {Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( i in elems ) {
value = callback( elems[ i ], i, arg );
if ( value != null ) {
ret[ ret.length ] = value;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( ; i < length; i++ ) {
value = callback( elems[ i ], i, arg );
if ( value != null ) {
ret[ ret.length ] = value;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return results;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return ( context || rootjQuery ).find( selector );Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return rootjQuery.ready( selector );Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return ret;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return elem[ name ];