Showing 488 of 488 total issues
Method LocalizationExceptionsLangBG
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static bool LocalizationExceptionsLangBG(string trTag)
{
switch (trTag)
{
case "airplane":
Method EnumerateItems
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static void EnumerateItems(string id, bool recursive = false)
{
try {
foreach (var item in BL.GetListByParentID(id, true)) {
if (!recursive)
Method EnumerateItems
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static void EnumerateItems(string id, bool recursive = false)
{
try {
foreach (var item in BL.GetListByParentID(id, true)) {
if (!recursive)
Method EnumerateItems
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static void EnumerateItems(string id, bool recursive = false)
{
try {
foreach (var item in BL.GetListByParentID(id, true)) {
if (!recursive)
Method CheckPreviousPremium
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static bool CheckPreviousPremium(Page page)
{
try
{
bool premiumRecovered = false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method CustomActionButton
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static StackLayout CustomActionButton(string icon, string text, string command)
{
var iconLabel = new Label {
HorizontalOptions = LayoutOptions.Center,
HorizontalTextAlignment = TextAlignment.Center,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (imageStream == null) {
if (item.Image != null) {
var customIcons = BL.GetIcons();
var customIcon = customIcons.Find(x => item.Image.Contains(x.IconID));
imageStream = customIcon != null ?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 133.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (icon == null) {
if (item.Image != null) {
var customIcons = BL.GetIcons();
var customIcon = customIcons.Find(x => item.Image.Contains(x.IconID));
icon = customIcon != null ?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 133.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method GetSettingsIcon
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static Grid GetSettingsIcon(bool solid, string iconFont, string iconText, string popupCommandName = "")
{
var icon = new Label {
TextColor = Theme.Current.MainTitleTextColor,
FontSize = 40,
Method GetFieldTypeNameByShortName
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static string GetFieldTypeNameByShortName(string fieldTypeShortName)
{
switch (fieldTypeShortName) {
case GConsts.FLDTYPE_ACNT:
return TR.Tr("ACNT");
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void AutoBackupSelector()
{
DisplayActionSheet(TR.Tr("settings_autobackup"), TR.Cancel, null,
TR.Tr("autobackup_no_backup"),
TR.Tr("autobackup_weekly"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void ExpiringPeriodSelector()
{
DisplayActionSheet(TR.Tr("settings_expiring_period"), TR.Cancel, null,
TR.Tr("settings_expiring_period_10"),
TR.Tr("settings_expiring_period_30"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method TestCaseDecrypt
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[Test]
public void TestCaseDecrypt()
{
const string password = "Sun001!";
const string expectedString = "nhh86c4uQKXu8rTjp4sL8rr2fxRMmnhWWhan8LiaVb4ZhTdF4RTlX4xcHYjwsfDu";
Method CheckPreviousPremium
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static bool CheckPreviousPremium(Page page)
{
try
{
bool premiumRecovered = false;
Method EnterPassword
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void EnterPassword()
{
// FIXME: create correct model view separation, change password should go to model!!!
var popup = new EntryPopup(TR.Tr("enter_new_password"), string.Empty, true);
popup.PopupClosed += (o, closedArgs) => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method AddListButton
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static void AddListButton(StackLayout stack, string modelCommand, string menuName, string menuIcon)
{
var itemsImportLayout = new StackLayout {
VerticalOptions = LayoutOptions.CenterAndExpand,
HorizontalOptions = LayoutOptions.Fill,
Method ChangePassword
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public bool ChangePassword(string newPassword)
{
try
{
nswdb.BeginTransaction();
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static byte[] ReadFully(Stream input)
{
byte[] buffer = new byte[16 * 1024];
using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream()) {
int read;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static byte[] ReadFully(Stream input)
{
byte[] buffer = new byte[16 * 1024];
using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream()) {
int read;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method wasSubscriptionPurchased
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async Task<bool> wasSubscriptionPurchased(string productID)
{
var billing = CrossInAppBilling.Current;
try