Method DecryptStringAES
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static string DecryptStringAES(byte[] encryptedData, string password, int reEncryptionCount, string hash, out bool ok)
{
ok = false;
var key = prepareKey(password, hash, reEncryptionCount);
Method EncryptStringAES
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static byte[] EncryptStringAES(string plainText, string password, int reEncryptionCount, string hash, out bool ok)
{
ok = false;
byte[] bytes;
Method GenerateCleverPassword
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static string GenerateCleverPassword(string passwordPattern)
{
Random rand = new Random(DateTime.Now.Millisecond);
var generatedPassword = "";
Method DecryptStringAES
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static string DecryptStringAES(byte[] encryptedData, string password, int reEncryptionCount, string hash, out bool ok)
Method EncryptStringAES
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static byte[] EncryptStringAES(string plainText, string password, int reEncryptionCount, string hash, out bool ok)
Method GeneratePassword
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static string GeneratePassword(bool lowerCase, bool upperCase, bool digits, bool special, int len)
FIXME found Open
// FIXME: remove as soon as possible
- Exclude checks
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try
{
using (MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream())
{
using (AesManaged myAes = new AesManaged())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 325.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76