Showing 65 of 65 total issues
Function checkedOn
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkedOn(name) {
let names, formName, attrName, forms, elements, cb, value
names = this._.getNames(name)
formName = names[0]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
collectionPath() {
let resources = Inflector.pluralize(Inflector.underscore(this.resourceName))
return this._.pathPrefix() + resources
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
collectionPath() {
let resources = Inflector.pluralize(Inflector.underscore(this.resourceName))
return this._.pathPrefix() + resources
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (elem.name.slice(-2) === '[]') {
if (!Array.isArray(obj[elem.name])) obj[elem.name] = []
if (elem.checked) obj[elem.name].push(elem.value)
}
else {
Function ajax
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function(httpMethod, path, params, callback, errorHandler) {
params = params || {}
errorHandler = errorHandler || this.defaultErrorHandler
this._.applyAdapter()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (k = 0; k < tForm[elemName].length; k++) {
if (elem.value === tForm[elemName][k]) {
elem.checked = true
break
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (elem.value !== tForm[elemName])
elem.value = tForm[elemName] ? tForm[elemName] : ''
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
else if (elem.type === 'radio') {
if (elem.checked) obj[elem.name] = elem.value
}
else {
obj[elem.name] = elem.value
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (key2 in value) {
if (value.hasOwnProperty(key2)) {
this._.setValue(key1 + '.' + key2, value[key2])
}
}
Function ajax
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function(httpMethod, path, params, callback, errorHandler) {
Function merge
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Cape.merge = function() {
let i, key
for (i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++)
for (key in arguments[i])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getValue(name) {
let names, formName, attrName, form, _form
names = this.getNames(name)
formName = names[0]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extractClassNames
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extractClassNames(classNames, options) {
if (typeof options['className'] === 'object') {
for (let name in options['className']) {
if (options['className'][name]) classNames.push(name)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function show
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
show(klass, params) {
this.query = {}
if (params !== undefined) {
for (let prop in params) {
if ({}.hasOwnProperty.call(params, prop)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getComponentClassFor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getComponentClassFor(route) {
let fragments = []
if (route.container) {
route.container.split('.').forEach(part => {
fragments.push(Inflector.camelize(part))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mount
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
mount(id) {
if (id === undefined)
throw new Error("The first argument is missing.")
if (typeof id !== 'string')
throw new Error("The first argument must be a string.")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function textareaField
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
textareaField(attrName, options) {
let formName, vform, dasherized
if (attrName && this.fieldNamePrefix)
attrName = this.fieldNamePrefix + '/' + attrName
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function redirectTo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
redirectTo(hash, params, options) {
// For backward compatibility, if the second argument has a key 'notice'
// or 'alert' and the third argument is undefined, the second argument
// should be treated as options.
if (typeof params === 'object' && options === undefined) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extend
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Cape.extend = function() {
let i, key
for (i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++)
for (key in arguments[i])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The body of a for-in should be wrapped in an if statement to filter unwanted properties from the prototype. Open
for (let key in params) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Require Guarding for-in (guard-for-in)
Looping over objects with a for in
loop will include properties that are inherited through the prototype chain. This behavior can lead to unexpected items in your for loop.
for (key in foo) {
doSomething(key);
}
Note that simply checking foo.hasOwnProperty(key)
is likely to cause an error in some cases; see [no-prototype-builtins](no-prototype-builtins.md).
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at preventing unexpected behavior that could arise from using a for in
loop without filtering the results in the loop. As such, it will warn when for in
loops do not filter their results with an if
statement.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint guard-for-in: "error"*/
for (key in foo) {
doSomething(key);
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint guard-for-in: "error"*/
for (key in foo) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(foo, key)) {
doSomething(key);
}
if ({}.hasOwnProperty.call(foo, key)) {
doSomething(key);
}
}
Related Rules
- [no-prototype-builtins](no-prototype-builtins.md)