Showing 26 of 26 total issues
Function main
has a Cognitive Complexity of 111 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func main() {
var metricsAddr string
var enableLeaderElection bool
var probeAddr string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function main
has 395 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func main() {
var metricsAddr string
var enableLeaderElection bool
var probeAddr string
Method AppWorkloadToStatefulsetConverter.Convert
has 133 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *AppWorkloadToStatefulsetConverter) Convert(appWorkload *korifiv1alpha1.AppWorkload) (*appsv1.StatefulSet, error) {
envs := appWorkload.Spec.Env
fieldEnvs := []corev1.EnvVar{
{
File app.go
has 548 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package handlers
import (
"context"
"errors"
App
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type App struct {
serverURL url.URL
appRepo CFAppRepository
dropletRepo CFDropletRepository
processRepo CFProcessRepository
Method ProcessStats.FetchStats
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (a *ProcessStats) FetchStats(ctx context.Context, authInfo authorization.Info, processGUID string) ([]PodStatsRecord, error) {
processRecord, err := a.processRepo.GetProcess(ctx, authInfo, processGUID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
Function ForApp
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ForApp(responseApp repositories.AppRecord, baseURL url.URL) AppResponse {
return AppResponse{
Name: responseApp.Name,
GUID: responseApp.GUID,
State: string(responseApp.State),
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
switch strings.ToLower(authInfo.Scheme()) {
case BearerScheme:
config.BearerToken = authInfo.Token
case CertScheme:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 173.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
switch strings.ToLower(authInfo.Scheme()) {
case BearerScheme:
config.BearerToken = authInfo.Token
case CertScheme:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 173.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method RoleRepo.CreateRole
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *RoleRepo) CreateRole(ctx context.Context, authInfo authorization.Info, role CreateRoleMessage) (RoleRecord, error) {
userClient, err := r.userClientFactory.BuildClient(authInfo)
if err != nil {
return RoleRecord{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to build user client: %w", err)
}
Method DuplicateValidator.ValidateUpdate
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v DuplicateValidator) ValidateUpdate(ctx context.Context, logger logr.Logger, namespace string, oldObj, obj UniqueClientObject) error {
if oldObj.UniqueName() == obj.UniqueName() {
return nil
}
Function ForDroplet
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ForDroplet(dropletRecord repositories.DropletRecord, baseURL url.URL) DropletResponse {
toReturn := DropletResponse{
GUID: dropletRecord.GUID,
CreatedAt: formatTimestamp(&dropletRecord.CreatedAt),
UpdatedAt: formatTimestamp(dropletRecord.UpdatedAt),
Function ForBuild
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ForBuild(buildRecord repositories.BuildRecord, baseURL url.URL) BuildResponse {
toReturn := BuildResponse{
GUID: buildRecord.GUID,
CreatedAt: formatTimestamp(&buildRecord.CreatedAt),
UpdatedAt: formatTimestamp(buildRecord.UpdatedAt),
Function NewApp
has 9 arguments (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serverURL url.URL,
appRepo CFAppRepository,
dropletRepo CFDropletRepository,
processRepo CFProcessRepository,
routeRepo CFRouteRepository,
Function SetupIndexWithManager
has 13 return statements (exceeds 8 allowed). Open
func SetupIndexWithManager(mgr manager.Manager) error {
err := mgr.GetFieldIndexer().IndexField(context.Background(), new(korifiv1alpha1.CFRoute), IndexRouteDestinationAppName, routeDestinationAppNameIndexFn)
if err != nil {
return err
}
Method Client.Push
has 12 return statements (exceeds 8 allowed). Open
func (c Client) Push(ctx context.Context, creds Creds, repoRef string, zipReader io.Reader, tags ...string) (string, error) {
tmpFile, err := os.CreateTemp(os.TempDir(), "sourceimg-%s")
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("failed to create a temp file for image: %w", err)
}
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (h *ServiceInstance) sortList(siList []repositories.ServiceInstanceRecord, order string) {
switch order {
case "":
case "created_at":
sort.Slice(siList, func(i, j int) bool { return timePtrAfter(&siList[j].CreatedAt, &siList[i].CreatedAt) })
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 416.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (h *Buildpack) sortList(bpList []repositories.BuildpackRecord, order string) {
switch order {
case "":
case "created_at":
sort.Slice(bpList, func(i, j int) bool { return timePtrAfter(&bpList[j].CreatedAt, &bpList[i].CreatedAt) })
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 416.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function NewRoleRepo
has 7 arguments (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
userClientFactory authorization.UserK8sClientFactory,
spaceRepo *SpaceRepo,
authorizedInChecker AuthorizedInChecker,
namespacePermissions *authorization.NamespacePermissions,
rootNamespace string,
Function NewPackage
has 7 arguments (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serverURL url.URL,
packageRepo CFPackageRepository,
appRepo CFAppRepository,
dropletRepo CFDropletRepository,
imageRepo ImageRepository,