Showing 179 of 191 total issues
Assignment Branch Condition size for create is too high. [<2, 19, 3> 19.34/17] Open
def create
@workshop = Workshop.new(workshop_params)
authorize(@workshop)
if workshop_type_valid? && @workshop.save
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_Software_Metric.
Interpreting ABC size:
- <= 17 satisfactory
- 18..30 unsatisfactory
- > 30 dangerous
You can have repeated "attributes" calls count as a single "branch".
For this purpose, attributes are any method with no argument; no attempt
is meant to distinguish actual attr_reader
from other methods.
Example: CountRepeatedAttributes: false (default is true)
# `model` and `current_user`, referenced 3 times each,
# are each counted as only 1 branch each if
# `CountRepeatedAttributes` is set to 'false'
def search
@posts = model.active.visible_by(current_user)
.search(params[:q])
@posts = model.some_process(@posts, current_user)
@posts = model.another_process(@posts, current_user)
render 'pages/search/page'
end
This cop also takes into account AllowedMethods
(defaults to []
)
And AllowedPatterns
(defaults to []
)
Do not prefix writer method names with set_
. Open
def set_host(host_id)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Makes sure that accessor methods are named properly. Applies to both instance and class methods.
NOTE: Offenses are only registered for methods with the expected
arity. Getters (get_attribute
) must have no arguments to be
registered, and setters (set_attribute(value)
) must have exactly
one.
Example:
# bad
def set_attribute(value)
end
# good
def attribute=(value)
end
# bad
def get_attribute
end
# good
def attribute
end
# accepted, incorrect arity for getter
def get_value(attr)
end
# accepted, incorrect arity for setter
def set_value
end
Omit the hash value. Open
@workshop_sponsor ||= WorkshopSponsor.new(workshop: @workshop, sponsor: @sponsor, host: host)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Omit the hash value. Open
@invitation = Invitation.find_or_create_by(event: @event, member: current_user, role: role)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Omit the hash value. Open
amount: amount,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Assignment Branch Condition size for rsvp is too high. [<2, 18, 4> 18.55/17] Open
def rsvp
unless @workshop.available_for_rsvp?
return redirect_back(
fallback_location: root_path,
notice: t('workshops.registration_not_open')
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_Software_Metric.
Interpreting ABC size:
- <= 17 satisfactory
- 18..30 unsatisfactory
- > 30 dangerous
You can have repeated "attributes" calls count as a single "branch".
For this purpose, attributes are any method with no argument; no attempt
is meant to distinguish actual attr_reader
from other methods.
Example: CountRepeatedAttributes: false (default is true)
# `model` and `current_user`, referenced 3 times each,
# are each counted as only 1 branch each if
# `CountRepeatedAttributes` is set to 'false'
def search
@posts = model.active.visible_by(current_user)
.search(params[:q])
@posts = model.some_process(@posts, current_user)
@posts = model.another_process(@posts, current_user)
render 'pages/search/page'
end
This cop also takes into account AllowedMethods
(defaults to []
)
And AllowedPatterns
(defaults to []
)
Uniqueness validation should have a unique index on the database column. Open
validates :uid, uniqueness: { constraint: :provider }
- Exclude checks
Prefer has_many :through
to has_and_belongs_to_many
. Open
has_and_belongs_to_many :chapters, join_table: 'chapters_events'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for the use of the hasandbelongstomany macro.
Example:
# bad
# has_and_belongs_to_many :ingredients
# good
# has_many :ingredients, through: :recipe_ingredients
Do not prefix writer method names with set_
. Open
def set_organisers(organiser_ids)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Makes sure that accessor methods are named properly. Applies to both instance and class methods.
NOTE: Offenses are only registered for methods with the expected
arity. Getters (get_attribute
) must have no arguments to be
registered, and setters (set_attribute(value)
) must have exactly
one.
Example:
# bad
def set_attribute(value)
end
# good
def attribute=(value)
end
# bad
def get_attribute
end
# good
def attribute
end
# accepted, incorrect arity for getter
def get_value(attr)
end
# accepted, incorrect arity for setter
def set_value
end
Do not prefix writer method names with set_
. Open
def set_organisers(organiser_ids)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Makes sure that accessor methods are named properly. Applies to both instance and class methods.
NOTE: Offenses are only registered for methods with the expected
arity. Getters (get_attribute
) must have no arguments to be
registered, and setters (set_attribute(value)
) must have exactly
one.
Example:
# bad
def set_attribute(value)
end
# good
def attribute=(value)
end
# bad
def get_attribute
end
# good
def attribute
end
# accepted, incorrect arity for getter
def get_value(attr)
end
# accepted, incorrect arity for setter
def set_value
end
Convert if
nested inside else
to elsif
. Open
if current_service
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
If the else
branch of a conditional consists solely of an if
node,
it can be combined with the else
to become an elsif
.
This helps to keep the nesting level from getting too deep.
Example:
# bad
if condition_a
action_a
else
if condition_b
action_b
else
action_c
end
end
# good
if condition_a
action_a
elsif condition_b
action_b
else
action_c
end
Example: AllowIfModifier: false (default)
# bad
if condition_a
action_a
else
action_b if condition_b
end
# good
if condition_a
action_a
elsif condition_b
action_b
end
Example: AllowIfModifier: true
# good
if condition_a
action_a
else
action_b if condition_b
end
# good
if condition_a
action_a
elsif condition_b
action_b
end
sponsor
, destroy_sponsor
, host
, destroy_host
are not explicitly defined on the module. Open
before_action :set_workshop, only: %i[sponsor destroy_sponsor host destroy_host]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that methods specified in the filter's only
or
except
options are defined within the same class or module.
You can technically specify methods of superclass or methods added by mixins on the filter, but these can confuse developers. If you specify methods that are defined in other classes or modules, you should define the filter in that class or module.
If you rely on behaviour defined in the superclass actions, you must
remember to invoke super
in the subclass actions.
Example:
# bad
class LoginController < ApplicationController
before_action :require_login, only: %i[index settings logout]
def index
end
end
# good
class LoginController < ApplicationController
before_action :require_login, only: %i[index settings logout]
def index
end
def settings
end
def logout
end
end
Example:
# bad
module FooMixin
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
before_action proc { authenticate }, only: :foo
end
end
# good
module FooMixin
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
before_action proc { authenticate }, only: :foo
end
def foo
# something
end
end
Example:
class ContentController < ApplicationController
def update
@content.update(content_attributes)
end
end
class ArticlesController < ContentController
before_action :load_article, only: [:update]
# the cop requires this method, but it relies on behaviour defined
# in the superclass, so needs to invoke `super`
def update
super
end
private
def load_article
@content = Article.find(params[:article_id])
end
end
Avoid using update_attribute
because it skips validations. Open
@workshop.workshop_sponsors.find_by(host: true).update_attribute(:host, false)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for the use of methods which skip validations which are listed in https://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_validations.html#skipping-validations
Methods may be ignored from this rule by configuring a Whitelist
.
Example:
# bad
Article.first.decrement!(:view_count)
DiscussionBoard.decrement_counter(:post_count, 5)
Article.first.increment!(:view_count)
DiscussionBoard.increment_counter(:post_count, 5)
person.toggle :active
product.touch
Billing.update_all("category = 'authorized', author = 'David'")
user.update_attribute(:website, 'example.com')
user.update_columns(last_request_at: Time.current)
Post.update_counters 5, comment_count: -1, action_count: 1
# good
user.update(website: 'example.com')
FileUtils.touch('file')
Example: Whitelist: ["touch"]
# bad
DiscussionBoard.decrement_counter(:post_count, 5)
DiscussionBoard.increment_counter(:post_count, 5)
person.toggle :active
# good
user.touch
Omit the hash value. Open
invitation = WorkshopInvitation.create(workshop: workshop, member: member, role: role)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Omit the hash value. Open
invitation = Invitation.new(event: event, member: coach, role: 'Coach')
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Specify a :dependent
option. Open
has_many :meeting_invitations
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop looks for has_many
or has_one
associations that don't
specify a :dependent
option.
It doesn't register an offense if :through
option was specified.
Example:
# bad
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments
has_one :avatar
end
# good
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments, dependent: :restrict_with_exception
has_one :avatar, dependent: :destroy
has_many :patients, through: :appointments
end
Omit the hash value. Open
invitation = meeting.invitations.find_or_create_by(member: member)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Use request.referer
instead of request.referrer
. Open
request.referrer || root_path
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for consistent uses of request.referer
or
request.referrer
, depending on the cop's configuration.
Example: EnforcedStyle: referer (default)
# bad
request.referrer
# good
request.referer
Example: EnforcedStyle: referrer
# bad
request.referer
# good
request.referrer
Omit the hash value. Open
@subscription = Subscription.new(group_id: group_id, member: current_user)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks hash literal syntax.
It can enforce either the use of the class hash rocket syntax or the use of the newer Ruby 1.9 syntax (when applicable).
A separate offense is registered for each problematic pair.
The supported styles are:
- ruby19 - forces use of the 1.9 syntax (e.g.
{a: 1}
) when hashes have all symbols for keys - hash_rockets - forces use of hash rockets for all hashes
- nomixedkeys - simply checks for hashes with mixed syntaxes
- ruby19nomixed_keys - forces use of ruby 1.9 syntax and forbids mixed syntax hashes
This cop has EnforcedShorthandSyntax
option.
It can enforce either the use of the explicit hash value syntax or
the use of Ruby 3.1's hash value shorthand syntax.
The supported styles are:
- always - forces use of the 3.1 syntax (e.g. {foo:})
- never - forces use of explicit hash literal value
- either - accepts both shorthand and explicit use of hash literal value
- consistent - forces use of the 3.1 syntax only if all values can be omitted in the hash
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19 (default)
# bad
{:a => 2}
{b: 1, :c => 2}
# good
{a: 2, b: 1}
{:c => 2, 'd' => 2} # acceptable since 'd' isn't a symbol
{d: 1, 'e' => 2} # technically not forbidden
Example: EnforcedStyle: hash_rockets
# bad
{a: 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 5}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: nomixedkeys
# bad
{:a => 1, b: 2}
{c: 1, 'd' => 2}
# good
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 1, d: 2}
Example: EnforcedStyle: ruby19nomixed_keys
# bad
{:a => 1, :b => 2}
{c: 2, 'd' => 3} # should just use hash rockets
# good
{a: 1, b: 2}
{:c => 3, 'd' => 4}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: always (default)
# bad
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: never
# bad
{foo:, bar:}
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: either
# good
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# good
{foo: foo, bar:}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
Example: EnforcedShorthandSyntax: consistent
# bad - `foo` and `bar` values can be omitted
{foo: foo, bar: bar}
# bad - `bar` value can be omitted
{foo:, bar: bar}
# bad - mixed syntaxes
{foo:, bar: baz}
# good
{foo:, bar:}
# good - can't omit `baz`
{foo: foo, bar: baz}
Specify a :dependent
option. Open
has_many :attendance_warnings
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop looks for has_many
or has_one
associations that don't
specify a :dependent
option.
It doesn't register an offense if :through
option was specified.
Example:
# bad
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments
has_one :avatar
end
# good
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments, dependent: :restrict_with_exception
has_one :avatar, dependent: :destroy
has_many :patients, through: :appointments
end