Showing 572 of 572 total issues
Assignment Branch Condition size for new is too high. [16.4/15] Open
def new
id = session[:user_id]
user = User.find_by_id(id)
if id.nil?
render 'new'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [11/10] Open
def edit
@user_to_remove = User.find_by_id(params[:unwanted_user])
@user_to_remove.leave_team
notice = ""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for skills_str is too high. [7/6] Open
def skills_str
if talents.nil? || talents.length.zero?
return ''
end
skills = []
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method has too many lines. [11/10] Open
def skills_str
if talents.nil? || talents.length.zero?
return ''
end
skills = []
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for team_skills is too high. [15.43/15] Open
def team_skills
result = []
self.users.each do |user|
user.talents.each do |talent|
skill = Skill.find(talent.skill_id)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete
if @admin.superadmin == true
c = 0
for a in Admin.all
if params.has_key? "delete_#{a.name}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method skills_str
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def skills_str
if talents.nil? || talents.length.zero?
return ''
end
skills = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((time.month == 7 and time.day > 15) or (time.month == 8 and time.day <= 15) or
(time.month == 11 and time.day > 15) or time.month == 12)
puts "Sending Emails to Admins..."
AdminMailer.send_look_at_submission
puts "done."
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
oauth_hash = Rails.env.test? ? OmniAuth.config.mock_auth[:google] : env["omniauth.auth"]
user = User.user_from_oauth(oauth_hash)
admin = Admin.admin_from_oauth(oauth_hash)
session[:user_email] = oauth_hash[:info][:email]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@user = User.find_by_id(session[:user_id])
@team = Team.find_by_id(@user.team.id)
d1 = submission_params[:disc1id]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((time.month == 8 and time.day > 15) or time.month == 9 or
time.month == 1 or (time.month == 2 and time.day <= 20))
puts "Sending Emails to Admins..."
AdminMailer.send_look_at_submission
puts "done."
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return Team.all.each
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def send_disapproved_email(team)
@team = team
@team.users.each do |disapproved_user|
@user = disapproved_user
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def successfully_submitted_email(team)
@team = team
@team.users.each do |student|
@user = student
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def send_approved_email(team)
@team = team
@team.users.each do |approved_user|
@user = approved_user
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Use &&
instead of and
. Open
(time.month == 11 and time.day > 15) or time.month == 12)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of and
and or
, and suggests using &&
and
|| instead
. It can be configured to check only in conditions, or in
all contexts.
Example: EnforcedStyle: always (default)
# bad
foo.save and return
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: conditionals
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
foo.save and return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
puts "done."
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Unnecessary spacing detected. Open
class IsSingletonError < RuntimeError; end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for extra/unnecessary whitespace.
Example:
# good if AllowForAlignment is true
name = "RuboCop"
# Some comment and an empty line
website += "/bbatsov/rubocop" unless cond
puts "rubocop" if debug
# bad for any configuration
set_app("RuboCop")
website = "https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop"
Trailing whitespace detected. Open
- Exclude checks
Do not leave space between !
and its argument. Open
! approved &&
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for space after !
.
Example:
# bad
! something
# good
!something