concord-consortium/rigse

View on GitHub

Showing 2,136 of 2,138 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.up
    create_table :multiple_choices do |t|
      t.integer     :user_id
      t.column      :uuid, :string, :limit => 36

Severity: Minor
Found in rails/db/migrate/20090315182031_old_create_multiple_choices.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
rails/db/migrate/20090315182018_create_open_responses.rb on lines 2..12
rails/db/migrate/20090415200125_delete_multiple_choices.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def students_in_class(all_students)
    all_students.to_a.compact.uniq.sort{|a,b| (a.user ? [a.first_name, a.last_name] : ["",""]) <=> (b.user ? [b.first_name, b.last_name] : ["",""])}
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/helpers/application_helper.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
rails/app/helpers/portal/student_clazzes_helper.rb on lines 3..4

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.up
    create_table :open_responses do |t|
      t.integer     :user_id
      t.column      :uuid, :string, :limit => 36

Severity: Minor
Found in rails/db/migrate/20090315182018_create_open_responses.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
rails/db/migrate/20090315182031_old_create_multiple_choices.rb on lines 2..12
rails/db/migrate/20090415200125_delete_multiple_choices.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def destroy
    @interactive = Interactive.find(params[:id])
    authorize @interactive
    @interactive.destroy
    @redirect = params[:redirect]
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/controllers/interactives_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
rails/app/controllers/external_activities_controller.rb on lines 202..210

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def destroy
    @external_activity = ExternalActivity.find(params[:id])
    authorize @external_activity
    @external_activity.destroy
    @redirect = params[:redirect]
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/controllers/external_activities_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
rails/app/controllers/interactives_controller.rb on lines 120..128

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  class B64
    def self.folding_encode(str, eol = "\n", limit = 60)
      [str].pack('m')
    end

Severity: Minor
Found in rails/lib/b64.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
rails/lib/rack/expand_b64_gzip.rb on lines 38..48

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    class B64
      def self.folding_encode(str, eol = "\n", limit = 60)
        [str].pack('m')
      end

Severity: Minor
Found in rails/lib/rack/expand_b64_gzip.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
rails/lib/b64.rb on lines 2..12

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    create_table :attached_files do |t|
      t.integer :user_id
      t.string :name
      t.string :attachable_type
      t.integer :attachable_id
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/db/migrate/20110111211551_create_attached_files.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
rails/db/migrate/20090401095316_probes_and_more.rb on lines 72..82
rails/db/migrate/20170622210725_create_standard_statements.rb on lines 3..13

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    create_table :vendor_interfaces do |t|
      t.integer :user_id
      t.string  :name
      t.string  :short_name
      t.text    :description
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/db/migrate/20090401095316_probes_and_more.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
rails/db/migrate/20110111211551_create_attached_files.rb on lines 3..15
rails/db/migrate/20170622210725_create_standard_statements.rb on lines 3..13

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    create_table :standard_statements do |t|
      t.string  :uri
      t.string  :doc
      t.string  :statement_notation
      t.string  :statement_label
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/db/migrate/20170622210725_create_standard_statements.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
rails/db/migrate/20090401095316_probes_and_more.rb on lines 72..82
rails/db/migrate/20110111211551_create_attached_files.rb on lines 3..15

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function strftime has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  strftime: function(grammar) {
    var parts = { }, i18n = Date.default_i18n;
    var lambda = function(date, part) {
      switch (part) {
      // date
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/public/javascripts/light_box.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function getInputs has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  getInputs: function(form, typeName, name) {
    form = $(form);
    var inputs = form.getElementsByTagName('input');

    if (!typeName && !name) return $A(inputs).map(Element.extend);
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/prototype.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function ObjectRange has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

var ObjectRange = Class.create(Enumerable, (function() {
  function initialize(start, end, exclusive) {
    this.start = start;
    this.end = end;
    this.exclusive = exclusive;
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/prototype.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  initialize: function(request){
    this.request = request;
    var transport  = this.transport  = request.transport,
      readyState = this.readyState = transport.readyState;

Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/prototype.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function strftime has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  strftime: function(grammar) {
    var parts = { }, i18n = Date.default_i18n;
    var lambda = function(date, part) {
      switch (part) {
      // date
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/public/javascripts/light_box.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function position has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  position: function(e) {
    var x = Event.pointer(e).x,
        y = Event.pointer(e).y,
        vpDim = document.viewport.getDimensions(),
        vpOff = document.viewport.getScrollOffset(),
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/public/javascripts/light_box.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function draw has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    draw: function() {
        this.drawGrid();
        this.drawLabels();
        this.drawTitles();
    
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/flotr/flotr_out.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function createForm has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  createForm: function() {
    var ipe = this;
    function addText(mode, condition) {
      var text = ipe.options['text' + mode + 'Controls'];
      if (!text || condition === false) return;
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/controls.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function removeHash has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

       removeHash: function(hashValue) {
               var r;
               if (hashValue === null || hashValue === undefined) {
                       r = null;
               }
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/active_scaffold/default/dhtml_history.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function preview_home_page has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function preview_home_page(homePageContentId, homePageContent){
    var previewContent = null;

    if(homePageContentId){
        previewContent = $(homePageContentId).value;
Severity: Minor
Found in rails/app/assets/javascripts/preview_home_page.js - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language