Showing 610 of 610 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (initDoc.trashed) {
remoteDocsToTrash.push(remoteFile)
} else {
await builders
.metafile()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function openOAuthView
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async openOAuthView(url /*: string */) {
try {
// Open remote OAuth flow in separate view, without Node integration.
// This avoids giving access to Node's API to remote code and allows
// remote code to load and make use of jQuery since it can't be loaded via
Function squashMoves
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function squashMoves(changes /*: LocalChange[] */) {
log.trace('Squash moves...')
const stopMeasure = measureTime('LocalWatcher#squashMoves')
for (let i = 0; i < changes.length; i++) {
Function doTrash
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async doTrash(
side /*: SideName */,
was /*: SavedMetadata */,
doc /*: Metadata */
) /*: Promise<void> */ {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function updated(
doc /*: Metadata */
) /*: RemoteFileUpdate | RemoteDirUpdate */ {
if (metadata.isFile(doc)) {
return {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function setup
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async setup() {
const clientInfo = this.clientInfo()
log.info(clientInfo, 'user config')
if (!this.config.isValid()) {
Function waitForNewChangeOn
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async waitForNewChangeOn(seq /*: number */, expectedPath /*: string */) {
log.debug({ path: expectedPath }, 'Waiting for new change to be merged')
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const opts = {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function deleted(
doc /*: SavedMetadata */
) /*: RemoteFileDeletion | RemoteDirDeletion */ {
if (metadata.isFile(doc)) {
return {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function doTrash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async doTrash(
side /*: SideName */,
was /*: SavedMetadata */,
doc /*: Metadata */
) /*: Promise<void> */ {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setupDesktop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const setupDesktop = async () => {
try {
// TODO: allow setting desktop up without running migrations (when opening
// a cozy-note)?
await desktop.setup()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function showWindow
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const showWindow = async bounds => {
if (
notificationsState.revokedAlertShown ||
notificationsState.syncDirUnlinkedShown
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function connect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async connect(
req /*: http.ClientRequest */,
opts /*: AgentConnectOpts */
) /*: Promise<http.Agent> */ {
const { secureEndpoint } = opts
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function trashWithParentOrByItself
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async trashWithParentOrByItself(
doc /*: SavedMetadata */,
side /*: Writer */
) /*: Promise<void> */ {
const parentPath = dirname(doc.path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setupDesktop
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const setupDesktop = async () => {
try {
// TODO: allow setting desktop up without running migrations (when opening
// a cozy-note)?
await desktop.setup()
Function handleBunyanMessage
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const handleBunyanMessage = msg => {
const level =
msg.level >= bunyan.FATAL
? 'fatal'
: msg.level >= bunyan.ERROR
Function detectOperation
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const detectOperation = async (
change /*: PouchDBFeedData */,
sync /*: Sync */
) /*: Promise<SyncOperation> */ => {
const outdatedSide = sync.selectSide(change)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (moveChangeSamePath && !moveChangeSamePath.old) {
// $FlowFixMe
moveChangeSamePath.type = 'Ignored'
delete moveChangeSamePath.wip
delete moveChangeSamePath.md5sum
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (addChangeSamePath && addChangeSamePath.wip) {
// $FlowFixMe
addChangeSamePath.type = 'Ignored'
delete addChangeSamePath.wip
delete addChangeSamePath.md5sum
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function analyseEvents
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function analyseEvents(
events /*: LocalEvent[] */,
pendingChanges /*: LocalChange[] */
) /*: LocalChange[] */ {
const stopMeasure = measureTime('LocalWatcher#analyseEvents')
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const watcher = chokidar.watch('.', {
cwd: syncPath,
ignored: /(^|[\/\\])\.system-tmp-cozy-drive/, // eslint-disable-line no-useless-escape
followSymlinks: false,
alwaysStat: true,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76