Showing 509 of 509 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search(:node, "roles:hadoop-masternamenode") do |nmas|
# search(:node, "roles:hadoop-masternamenode#{env_filter}") do |nmas|
if !nmas[:fqdn].nil? && !nmas[:fqdn].empty?
Chef::Log.info("HADOOP : MASTER [#{nmas[:fqdn]}") if debug
master_name_nodes << nmas[:fqdn]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search(:node, "roles:hadoop-secondarynamenode") do |nsec|
# search(:node, "roles:hadoop-secondarynamenode#{env_filter}") do |nsec|
if !nsec[:fqdn].nil? && !nsec[:fqdn].empty?
Chef::Log.info("HADOOP : SECONDARY [#{nsec[:fqdn]}") if debug
secondary_name_nodes << nsec[:fqdn]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search(:node, "roles:hadoop-slavenode") do |nslave|
# search(:node, "roles:hadoop-slavenode#{env_filter}") do |nslave|
if !nslave[:fqdn].nil? && !nslave[:fqdn].empty?
Chef::Log.info("HADOOP : SLAVE [#{nslave[:fqdn]}") if debug
slave_nodes << nslave[:fqdn]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
search(:node, "roles:hadoop-edgenode") do |nedge|
# search(:node, "roles:hadoop-edgenode#{env_filter}") do |nedge|
if !nedge[:fqdn].nil? && !nedge[:fqdn].empty?
Chef::Log.info("HADOOP : EDGE [#{nedge[:fqdn]}") if debug
edge_nodes << nedge[:fqdn]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method create_proposal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_proposal
@logger.debug("hive create_proposal: entering")
base = super
# Get the node list.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_proposal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_proposal
@logger.debug("pig create_proposal: entering")
base = super
# Get the node list.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method apply_role_pre_chef_call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
@logger.debug("hadoop apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
return if all_nodes.empty?
# Make sure that the front-end pieces have public ip addreses.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_proposal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_proposal
@logger.debug("sqoop create_proposal: entering")
base = super
# Get the node list.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method apply_role_pre_chef_call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
@logger.debug("hadoop_infrastructure apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
return if all_nodes.empty?
# Assign a public IP address to the edge node for external access.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Block has too many lines. [31/25] Open
to_use_disks.sort.each { |k|
# By default, we will format first partition.
target_suffix= k + "1"
target_dev = "/dev/#{k}"
target_dev_part = "/dev/#{target_suffix}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
slaves << n[:fqdn] if n[:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
slaves << nodes[1][:fqdn] if nodes[1][:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
edge << nodes[2][:fqdn] if nodes[2][:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
namenodes << nodes[1][:fqdn] if nodes[1][:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
namenodes << nodes[0][:fqdn] if nodes[0][:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
master << nodes[0][:fqdn] if nodes[0][:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
edgenodes << nodes[2][:fqdn] if nodes[2][:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
datanodes << n[:fqdn] if n[:fqdn]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if not File.exists?(shared_edits_directory)
Chef::Log.info("HI - Creating HA mount directory [#{shared_edits_directory}]") if debug
directory shared_edits_directory do
owner "hdfs"
group "hadoop"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if master_name_nodes.length == 0
Chef::Log.info("HADOOP : WARNING - Cannot find Hadoop master name node")
node[:hadoop][:cluster][:valid_config] = false
elsif master_name_nodes.length > 1
Chef::Log.info("HADOOP : WARNING - More than one master name node found")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76