crowbar/crowbar-openstack

View on GitHub

Showing 748 of 748 total issues

Method database_settings has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.database_settings(node, barclamp)
    instance = node[barclamp][:database_instance] || "default"

    # Cache the result for each cookbook in an instance variable hash. This
    # cache needs to be invalidated for each chef-client run from chef-client
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/cookbooks/crowbar-openstack/libraries/helpers.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_cisco_aci has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_cisco_aci(proposal)
    # Checks for Cisco ACI ml2 driver
    ml2_mechanism_drivers = proposal["attributes"]["neutron"]["ml2_mechanism_drivers"]
    ml2_type_drivers = proposal["attributes"]["neutron"]["ml2_type_drivers"]

Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/neutron_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate_proposal_after_save has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_proposal_after_save(proposal)
    validate_one_for_role proposal, "ironic-server"

    net_svc = NetworkService.new @logger
    network_proposal = Proposal.find_by(barclamp: net_svc.bc_name, name: "default")
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/ironic_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method apply_role_pre_chef_call has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
    @logger.debug("Cinder apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
    return if all_nodes.empty?

    controller_elements, controller_nodes, ha_enabled = role_expand_elements(role, "cinder-controller")
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/cinder_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

if node[:rabbitmq][:ha][:storage][:mode] == "drbd"
  colocation_constraint = "col-#{fs_primitive}"
  pacemaker_colocation colocation_constraint do
    score "inf"
    resources "#{fs_primitive} #{ms_name}:Master"
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/rabbitmq/recipes/ha.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/postgresql/recipes/ha_storage.rb on lines 123..140

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

if node[:database][:ha][:storage][:mode] == "drbd"
  colocation_constraint = "col-#{fs_primitive}"
  pacemaker_colocation colocation_constraint do
    score "inf"
    resources "#{fs_primitive} #{ms_name}:Master"
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/postgresql/recipes/ha_storage.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/rabbitmq/recipes/ha.rb on lines 154..171

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

def downgrade(ta, td, a, d)
  # new defaults
  a["volume_defaults"]["eqlx"] = ta["volume_defaults"]["eqlx"]

  # update the backends
chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/cinder/105_update_eqlx_options.rb on lines 1..17

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade(ta, td, a, d)
  # new defaults
  a["volume_defaults"]["eqlx"] = ta["volume_defaults"]["eqlx"]

  # update the backends
chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/cinder/105_update_eqlx_options.rb on lines 20..36

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 75.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method apply_role_pre_chef_call has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
    @logger.debug("Database apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
    return if all_nodes.empty?

    database_elements, database_nodes, database_ha_enabled = role_expand_elements(role, "database-server")
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/database_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method validate_proposal_after_save has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_proposal_after_save(proposal)
    # first, check for conflict with ceph
    Proposal.where(barclamp: "ceph").each {|p|
      next unless (p.status == "ready") || (p.status == "pending")
      ceph_role = p.role
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/swift_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method database_settings has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.database_settings(node, barclamp)
    instance = node[barclamp][:database_instance] || "default"

    # Cache the result for each cookbook in an instance variable hash. This
    # cache needs to be invalidated for each chef-client run from chef-client
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/cookbooks/crowbar-openstack/libraries/helpers.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method apply_role_pre_chef_call has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
    @logger.debug("Glance apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
    return if all_nodes.empty?

    # Role can be assigned to clusters, so we need to expand the elements to get the actual list of nodes.
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/glance_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method validate_ha_attributes has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_ha_attributes(attributes, cluster)
    storage_mode = attributes["ha"]["storage"]["mode"]
    role = available_clusters[cluster]

    case attributes["sql_engine"]
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/database_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade(ta, td, a, d)
  a["volume_defaults"]["vmware"]["ca_file"] = ta["volume_defaults"]["vmware"]["ca_file"]
  a["volume_defaults"]["vmware"]["insecure"] = ta["volume_defaults"]["vmware"]["insecure"]
  a["volumes"].each do |volume|
    next if volume["backend_driver"] != "vmware"
chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/cinder/012_add_ceph_config_file.rb on lines 1..10

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade ta, td, a, d
  a["volume_defaults"]["rbd"]["use_crowbar"] = ta["volume_defaults"]["rbd"]["use_crowbar"]
  a["volume_defaults"]["rbd"]["config_file"] = ta["volume_defaults"]["rbd"]["config_file"]
  a["volumes"].each do |volume|
    next if volume["backend_driver"] != "rbd"
chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/cinder/044_add_vmware_insecure.rb on lines 1..9

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  if (values.indexOf("gre") >= 0 || values.indexOf("vxlan") >= 0) {
    $('#l2pop_container').show();
  } else {
    $('#l2pop_container').hide();
  }
crowbar_framework/app/assets/javascripts/barclamps/neutron/application.js on lines 361..365

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  if (values.indexOf("openvswitch") >= 0 || values.indexOf("linuxbridge") >= 0) {
    $('#l2pop_container').show();
  } else {
    $('#l2pop_container').hide();
  }
crowbar_framework/app/assets/javascripts/barclamps/neutron/application.js on lines 302..306

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register sahara endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register octavia endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register magnum endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language