Sign upLogin

crowbar/crowbar-openstack

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 748 of 748 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register manila endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register manila endpoint v2" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register nova endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register designate endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register cinder endpoint v2" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register neutron endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register cinder endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register cinder endpoint v3" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 127..142
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

keystone_register "register nova_legacy endpoint" do
  protocol keystone_settings["protocol"]
  insecure keystone_settings["insecure"]
  host keystone_settings["internal_url_host"]
  port keystone_settings["admin_port"]
Severity: Major
Found in chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb and 11 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 101..116
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 132..147
chef/cookbooks/cinder/recipes/api.rb on lines 163..178
chef/cookbooks/designate/recipes/api.rb on lines 98..110
chef/cookbooks/magnum/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..101
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 93..108
chef/cookbooks/manila/recipes/api.rb on lines 125..140
chef/cookbooks/neutron/recipes/api_register.rb on lines 81..93
chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb on lines 109..124
chef/cookbooks/octavia/recipes/keystone.rb on lines 82..94
chef/cookbooks/sahara/recipes/api.rb on lines 86..98

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 71.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method validate_proposal_after_save has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_proposal_after_save(proposal)
    validate_one_for_role proposal, "rabbitmq-server"

    attributes = proposal["attributes"][@bc_name]
Severity: Minor
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/rabbitmq_service.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method downgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def downgrade(template_attrs, template_deployment, attrs, deployment)
  attrs["cpu_interval"] = template_attrs["cpu_interval"] unless attrs.key?("cpu_interval")
  attrs["disk_interval"] = template_attrs["disk_interval"] unless attrs.key?("disk_interval")
  attrs["meters_interval"] = template_attrs["meters_interval"] unless attrs.key?("meters_interval")
  attrs.delete("compute_interval") unless template_attrs.key?("compute_interval")
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/ceilometer/301_update_interval_options.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade ta, td, a, d
  # Old proposals had passwords created in the cookbook, so we need to migrate
  # them in the proposal and in the role. We use a class variable to set the
  # same password in the proposal and in the role.
  unless defined?(@@neutron_db_password)
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/neutron/005_generate_db_password.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade ta, td, a, d
  # Old proposals had passwords created in the cookbook, so we need to migrate
  # them in the proposal and in the role. We use a class variable to set the
  # same password in the proposal and in the role.
  unless defined?(@@cinder_db_password)
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/cinder/006_generate_db_password.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade ta, td, a, d
  # Old proposals had passwords created in the cookbook, so we need to migrate
  # them in the proposal and in the role. We use a class variable to set the
  # same password in the proposal and in the role.
  unless defined?(@@keystone_db_password)
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/keystone/005_generate_db_password.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade ta, td, a, d
  # Old proposals had passwords created in the cookbook, so we need to migrate
  # them in the proposal and in the role. We use a class variable to set the
  # same password in the proposal and in the role.
  unless defined?(@@rabbitmq_password)
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/rabbitmq/001_generate_password.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade(ta, td, a, d)
  a["ha"] = ta["ha"] unless a.key? "ha"

  # Cookbooks expect the 'enabled' flag under high level 'ha' map
  # - only during the upgrade it was moved under 'ha/mysql'
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/database/209_merge_db_roles.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade ta, td, a, d
  # Old proposals had passwords created in the cookbook, so we need to migrate
  # them in the proposal and in the role. We use a class variable to set the
  # same password in the proposal and in the role.
  unless defined?(@@heat_db_password)
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/heat/001_generate_db_password.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method upgrade has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def upgrade(template_attrs, template_deployment, attrs, deployment)
  attrs.delete("cpu_interval") unless template_attrs.key?("cpu_interval")
  attrs.delete("disk_interval") unless template_attrs.key?("disk_interval")
  attrs.delete("meters_interval") unless template_attrs.key?("meters_interval")
  attrs["compute_interval"] = template_attrs["compute_interval"] unless attrs.key?("compute_interval")
Severity: Minor
Found in chef/data_bags/crowbar/migrate/ceilometer/301_update_interval_options.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply_role_pre_chef_call(_old_role, role, all_nodes)
    @logger.debug("Barbican apply_role_pre_chef_call: "\
                  "entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")

    server_elements,
Severity: Major
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/barbican_service.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
crowbar_framework/app/models/magnum_service.rb on lines 109..133
crowbar_framework/app/models/monasca_service.rb on lines 164..192

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 70.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
    @logger.debug("Magnum apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")

    server_elements, server_nodes, ha_enabled = role_expand_elements(role, "magnum-server")
    reset_sync_marks_on_clusters_founders(server_elements)
Severity: Major
Found in crowbar_framework/app/models/magnum_service.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
crowbar_framework/app/models/barbican_service.rb on lines 90..118
crowbar_framework/app/models/monasca_service.rb on lines 164..192

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 70.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language