Showing 1,859 of 1,879 total issues
Function TestSSL
has 215 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestSSL(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []TestCase{
{
Definition: Definition{
Function TestSSL
has 212 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestSSL(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []TestCase{
{
Definition: Definition{
Method ServiceConnector.Connect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (h *ServiceConnector) Connect(
credentialValuesByID connector.CredentialValuesByID,
) error {
var err error
var serverConfig ServerConfig
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File protocol.go
has 651 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2017 Aleksandr Fedotov
Function TestProxyService_Start
has 178 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestProxyService_Start(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("stopped proxy service cannot be restarted", func(t *testing.T) {
connector := mock.NewConnector()
credentialRetriever := mock.NewCredentialRetriever()
listener := mock.NewListener()
Function Test_Config
has 165 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func Test_Config(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Reports absence of handlers", func(t *testing.T) {
yaml := `
---
`
Function GenerateConfigurations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func GenerateConfigurations() (config_v2.Config, LiveConfigurations) {
// initialised with health-check listener and handler
secretlessConfig := config_v2.Config{
Services: []*config_v2.Service{
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
[]byte{
0x4a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x35, 0x2e, 0x37, 0x2e, 0x31, 0x38, 0x00, 0x0f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x15, 0x12, 0x4b, 0x1f, 0x70, 0x2b, 0x33, 0x55, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0x08, 0x02, 0x00, 0xff, 0xc1,
0x15, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x30, 0x0d, 0x0a, 0x28,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 299.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
[]byte{
0x4a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x35, 0x2e, 0x35, 0x2e, 0x35, 0x36, 0x00, 0x5e, 0x06, 0x00, 0x00,
0x48, 0x6a, 0x5b, 0x6a, 0x24, 0x71, 0x30, 0x3a, 0x00, 0xff, 0xf7, 0x08, 0x02, 0x00, 0x0f, 0x80,
0x15, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x6f, 0x43, 0x40, 0x56, 0x6e,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 299.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function TestAllAvailablePlugins
has 140 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestAllAvailablePlugins(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Assembles internal and external plugins", func(t *testing.T) {
allPlugins, err := AllAvailablePluginsWithOptions(
"",
"",
Function GenerateConfigurations
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func GenerateConfigurations() (config_v2.Config, LiveConfigurations) {
// initialised with health-check listener and handler
secretlessConfig := config_v2.Config{
Services: []*config_v2.Service{
{
Method AuthenticationHandshake.handleBackendAuthResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (h *AuthenticationHandshake) handleBackendAuthResponse() {
if h.err != nil {
return
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function process_log. (14) Open
def process_log(logfile_path, baseline_backend):
percentages = {}
baselines = []
with open(logfile_path) as log_file:
for line in log_file:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function Test_Health
has 124 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func Test_Health(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("When nothing is proactively done", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Shows not ready", func(t *testing.T) {
callEnableHealthCheck()
assertHealthStatusCodeIsBad(ReadyEndpoint, t)
Logger
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Logger struct {
BackingLogger *stdlib_log.Logger
IsDebug bool
prefix string
}
Function TestConfigEnv
has 115 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestConfigEnv(t *testing.T) {
// Shared mocks and doubles
logger := loggermock.NewLogger()
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func TestGetStandardDeviation(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("nil input", func(t *testing.T) {
input := &map[int]int{}
res := GetStandardDeviation(input)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 237.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func TestGetMean(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("nil input", func(t *testing.T) {
input := &map[int]int{}
res := GetMean(input)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 237.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File protocol_test.go
has 531 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2017 Aleksandr Fedotov
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package pg
import (
"net"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 229.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76