Showing 45 of 45 total issues
Class Configuration
has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Configuration
attr_accessor :root_paths, :root,
:verbose,
:reporter, :redis_namespace, :redis_ttl,
:background_reporting_enabled,
Method start
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.start
return if running?
logger = Coverband.configuration.logger
@semaphore.synchronize do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method report_coverage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def report_coverage
@semaphore.synchronize do
raise "no Coverband store set" unless @store
files_with_line_usage = filtered_files(Delta.results)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class HTMLFormatter
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HTMLFormatter
attr_reader :notice, :base_path, :tracker, :page
def initialize(report, options = {})
@notice = options.fetch(:notice, nil)
Class HashRedisStore
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HashRedisStore < Base
FILE_KEY = "file"
FILE_LENGTH_KEY = "file_length"
META_DATA_KEYS = [DATA_KEY, FIRST_UPDATED_KEY, LAST_UPDATED_KEY, FILE_HASH].freeze
###
Class SourceFile
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class SourceFile
# TODO: Refactor Line into its own file
# Representation of a single line in a source file including
# this specific line's source code, line_number and code coverage,
# with the coverage being either nil (coverage not applicable, e.g. comment
Class AbstractTracker
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AbstractTracker
REPORT_ROUTE = "/"
TITLE = "abstract"
attr_accessor :target
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(env)
@request = Rack::Request.new(env)
return [401, {"www-authenticate" => 'Basic realm=""'}, [""]] unless check_auth
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method array_add
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def array_add(latest, original)
if latest.empty? && original.empty?
[]
elsif Coverband.configuration.use_oneshot_lines_coverage
latest.map!.with_index { |v, i| ((v + original[i] >= 1) ? 1 : 0) if v && original[i] }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate
current_coverage.each_with_object({}) do |(file, line_counts), new_results|
###
# Eager filter:
# Normally I would break this out into additional methods
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File configuration.rb
has 252 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Coverband
###
# Configuration parsing and options for the coverband gem.
###
class Configuration
Method call
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(env)
@request = Rack::Request.new(env)
return [401, {"www-authenticate" => 'Basic realm=""'}, [""]] unless check_auth
Method reset
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reset
@root = Dir.pwd
@root_paths = []
@ignore = IGNORE_DEFAULTS.map { |ignore_str| Regexp.new(ignore_str) }
@search_paths = TRACKED_DEFAULT_PATHS.dup
Method get_current_scov_data_imp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_current_scov_data_imp(store, roots, options = {})
scov_style_report = {}
store.get_coverage_report(options).each_pair do |name, data|
data.each_pair do |key, line_data|
next if Coverband.configuration.ignore.any? { |i| key.match?(i) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
@semaphore = Mutex.new
require "coverage"
if RUBY_PLATFORM == "java"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method report_as_json
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def report_as_json
return filtered_report_files.to_json if for_merged_report
result = Coverband::Utils::Results.new(filtered_report_files)
source_files = result.source_files
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
setTimeout(() => {
if (window.auto_click_anchor && $(window.auto_click_anchor).length > 0) {
$(window.auto_click_anchor).click();
}
}, 50)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
setTimeout(() => {
if (window.auto_click_anchor && $(window.auto_click_anchor).length > 0) {
$(window.auto_click_anchor).click();
}
}, 30);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method build_response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_response(req)
uri = URI.parse(path(req.path_parameters, req))
unless uri.host
if relative_path?(uri.path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method track_key
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def track_key(payload)
if (file = payload[:identifier])
if newly_seen_key?(file)
@logged_keys << file
@keys_to_record << file if track_file?(file)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"