danmcclain/postgres_ext

View on GitHub
lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method contains has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def contains(opts, *rest)
        build_where_chain(opts, rest) do |rel|
          case rel
          when Arel::Nodes::In, Arel::Nodes::Equality
            column = left_column(rel) || column_from_association(rel)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method contained_in_array has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def contained_in_array(opts, *rest)
        build_where_chain(opts, rest) do |rel|
          case rel
          when Arel::Nodes::In, Arel::Nodes::Equality
            column = left_column(rel) || column_from_association(rel)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_rank has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def build_rank(arel, rank_window_options)
      unless arel.projections.count == 1 && Arel::Nodes::Count === arel.projections.first
        rank_window = case rank_window_options
                      when :order
                        arel.orders
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_with has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def build_with(arel)
      with_statements = with_values.flat_map do |with_value|
        case with_value
        when String
          with_value
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method equality_for_hstore has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def equality_for_hstore(rel)
        new_right_name = rel.left.name.to_s
        if rel.right.respond_to?(:val)
          return if rel.right.val.is_a?(Hash)
          rel.right = Arel::Nodes.build_quoted({new_right_name => rel.right.val},
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def contains(opts, *rest)
        build_where_chain(opts, rest) do |rel|
          case rel
          when Arel::Nodes::In, Arel::Nodes::Equality
            column = left_column(rel) || column_from_association(rel)
Severity: Major
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb on lines 36..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def contained_in_array(opts, *rest)
        build_where_chain(opts, rest) do |rel|
          case rel
          when Arel::Nodes::In, Arel::Nodes::Equality
            column = left_column(rel) || column_from_association(rel)
Severity: Major
Found in lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/postgres_ext/active_record/relation/query_methods.rb on lines 16..31

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status