Showing 65 of 65 total issues
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
sort = case params[:sort]
when "relevance" then { "_score" => { order: "desc" } }
when "name" then { "family_name.raw" => { order: "asc" } }
when "-name" then { "family_name.raw" => { order: "desc" } }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_by_id
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.import_by_id(options = {})
return nil if options[:id].blank?
id = options[:id].to_i
index = if Rails.env.test?
Method import_by_id
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.import_by_id(options = {})
return nil if options[:id].blank?
id = options[:id].to_i
index = if Rails.env.test?
Method orcid
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def orcid
auth = request.env["omniauth.auth"]
omniauth = flash[:omniauth] || {}
if current_user.present?
Method load_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_index
sort = case params[:sort]
when "relevance" then { "_score" => { order: "desc" } }
when "doi" then { "doi" => { order: "asc" } }
when "-doi" then { "doi" => { order: "desc" } }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function contributionsViz
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function contributionsViz(json, sources) {
data = json.contributions;
json.href = "?page={{number}}";
if (source_id !== "") { json.href += "&source_id=" + source_id; }
Method orcid_work_type
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def orcid_work_type(internal_work_type, internal_work_subtype)
type = case internal_work_type
when "Text"
case internal_work_subtype
when /^(Article|Articles|Journal Article|JournalArticle)$/i
Method initialize
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(user)
user ||= User.new(role_id: "anonymous") # Guest user
if user.role_id == "staff_admin"
can :manage, :all
Method load_index
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_index
sort = case params[:sort]
when "relevance" then { "_score" => { order: "desc" } }
when "doi" then { "doi" => { order: "asc" } }
when "-doi" then { "doi" => { order: "desc" } }
Method process_data
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_data(options = {})
start
result = collect_data
Method globus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def globus
auth = request.env["omniauth.auth"]
if current_user.present?
@user = current_user
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method serialize_errors
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def serialize_errors(errors, options = {})
return nil if errors.nil?
errors_arr = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sort = case params[:sort]
when "relevance" then { "_score" => { order: "desc" } }
when "name" then { "family_name.raw" => { order: "asc" } }
when "-name" then { "family_name.raw" => { order: "desc" } }
when "created" then { created_at: { order: "asc" } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sort = case params[:sort]
when "relevance" then { "_score" => { order: "desc" } }
when "name" then { "family_name.raw" => { order: "asc" } }
when "-name" then { "family_name.raw" => { order: "desc" } }
when "created" then { created_at: { order: "asc" } }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method parse_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_data(works, _options = {})
Array(works).map do |work|
work.extend Hashie::Extensions::DeepFetch
doi = work.deep_fetch("external-ids", "external-id", 0, "external-id-value") { nil }
claimed_at = get_iso8601_from_epoch(work.deep_fetch("last-modified-date", "value") { nil })
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_data(options = {})
start
result = collect_data
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method orcid_work_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def orcid_work_type(internal_work_type, internal_work_subtype)
type = case internal_work_type
when "Text"
case internal_work_subtype
when /^(Article|Articles|Journal Article|JournalArticle)$/i
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_index(options = {})
alias_name = options[:alias] || index_name
index_name = (options[:index] || self.index_name) + "_v1"
alternate_index_name = (options[:index] || self.index_name) + "_v2"
client = Elasticsearch::Model.client
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if @claim.save
@claim.queue_claim_job
options = {}
options[:include] = @include
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if @claim.save
@claim.queue_claim_job
options = {}
options[:include] = @include
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76