davispuh/TimezoneParser

View on GitHub
lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

Method updateAbbreviations has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.updateAbbreviations(abbreviations)
            getLocales.each do |locale|
                tz = Cldr::Export::Data::Timezones.new(locale)
                next if tz.timezones.empty? and tz.metazones.empty?
                tz.timezones.each do |timezone, data|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getTimezones has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.getTimezones
            timezones = { }
            getLocales.each do |locale|
                tz = Cldr::Export::Data::Timezones.new(locale)
                next if tz.timezones.empty? and tz.metazones.empty?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getMetazones has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.getMetazones
            zones = {}
            Cldr::Export::Data::Metazones.new[:timezones].each do |timezone, zonedata|
                zonedata.each do |data|
                    entry = {}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method updateAbbreviations has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def self.updateAbbreviations(abbreviations)
            getLocales.each do |locale|
                tz = Cldr::Export::Data::Timezones.new(locale)
                next if tz.timezones.empty? and tz.metazones.empty?
                tz.timezones.each do |timezone, data|
Severity: Major
Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method getTimezones has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def self.getTimezones
                timezones = { }
                getLocales.each do |locale|
                    tz = Cldr::Export::Data::Timezones.new(locale)
                    next if tz.timezones.empty? and tz.metazones.empty?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

                      tz.metazones.each do |metazone, data|
                          data[:short].to_a.each do |type, name|
                              next if name == '∅∅∅'
                              name = name.chomp.strip
                              type = type.to_s.encode(Encoding::UTF_8)
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
      lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb on lines 110..131

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 95.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

                      tz.timezones.each do |timezone, data|
                          data[:short].to_a.each do |type, name|
                              next if name == '∅∅∅'
                              name = name.chomp.strip
                              type = type.to_s.encode(Encoding::UTF_8)
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
      lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb on lines 134..155

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 95.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

                              if type == 'generic'
                                  self.updateHash(timezones[locale][name], 'Types', 'standard')
                                  self.updateHash(timezones[locale][name], 'Types', 'daylight')
                              else
                                  self.updateHash(timezones[locale][name], 'Types', type)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
      lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb on lines 92..96

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 32.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

                              if type == 'generic'
                                  self.updateHash(timezones[locale][name], 'Types', 'standard')
                                  self.updateHash(timezones[locale][name], 'Types', 'daylight')
                              else
                                  self.updateHash(timezones[locale][name], 'Types', type)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
      lib/timezone_parser/data/cldr.rb on lines 76..80

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 32.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status