Showing 1,853 of 1,853 total issues
Function ServiceSpecToGRPC
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ServiceSpecToGRPC(s types.ServiceSpec) (swarmapi.ServiceSpec, error) {
name := s.Name
if name == "" {
name = namesgenerator.GetRandomName(0)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File container_routes.go
has 690 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package container // import "github.com/docker/docker/api/server/router/container"
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
Method LogEntry.Unmarshal
has 188 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *LogEntry) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method Builder.Build
has 186 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Builder) Build(ctx context.Context, opt backend.BuildConfig) (*builder.Result, error) {
if len(opt.Options.Outputs) > 1 {
return nil, errors.Errorf("multiple outputs not supported")
}
Method pushDescriptor.Upload
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (pd *pushDescriptor) Upload(ctx context.Context, progressOutput progress.Output) (distribution.Descriptor, error) {
// Skip foreign layers unless this registry allows nondistributable artifacts.
if !pd.endpoint.AllowNondistributableArtifacts {
if fs, ok := pd.layer.(distribution.Describable); ok {
if d := fs.Descriptor(); len(d.URLs) > 0 {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method BulkSyncMessage.Unmarshal
has 184 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *BulkSyncMessage) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
File networkallocator.go
has 678 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package cnmallocator
import (
"context"
"fmt"
Method Cluster.ServiceLogs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 56 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) ServiceLogs(ctx context.Context, selector *backend.LogSelector, config *container.LogsOptions) (<-chan *backend.LogMessage, error) {
c.mu.RLock()
defer c.mu.RUnlock()
state := c.currentNodeState()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.ContainerRename
has a Cognitive Complexity of 56 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) ContainerRename(oldName, newName string) (retErr error) {
if oldName == "" || newName == "" {
return errdefs.InvalidParameter(errors.New("Neither old nor new names may be empty"))
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File backend_linux.go
has 676 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package plugin // import "github.com/docker/docker/plugin"
import (
"archive/tar"
"bytes"
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *containerRouter) initRoutes() {
r.routes = []router.Route{
// HEAD
router.NewHeadRoute("/containers/{name:.*}/archive", r.headContainersArchive),
// GET
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 441.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (sr *swarmRouter) initRoutes() {
sr.routes = []router.Route{
router.NewPostRoute("/swarm/init", sr.initCluster),
router.NewPostRoute("/swarm/join", sr.joinCluster),
router.NewPostRoute("/swarm/leave", sr.leaveCluster),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 441.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Cluster.resolveSystemAddrViaSubnetCheck
has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) resolveSystemAddrViaSubnetCheck() (net.IP, error) {
// Use the system's only IP address, or fail if there are
// multiple addresses to choose from. Skip interfaces which
// are managed by docker via subnet check.
interfaces, err := net.Interfaces()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.buildSandboxOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) buildSandboxOptions(cfg *config.Config, container *container.Container) ([]libnetwork.SandboxOption, error) {
var sboxOptions []libnetwork.SandboxOption
sboxOptions = append(sboxOptions, libnetwork.OptionHostname(container.Config.Hostname), libnetwork.OptionDomainname(container.Config.Domainname))
if container.HostConfig.NetworkMode.IsHost() {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ServiceSpecToGRPC
has 175 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ServiceSpecToGRPC(s types.ServiceSpec) (swarmapi.ServiceSpec, error) {
name := s.Name
if name == "" {
name = namesgenerator.GetRandomName(0)
}
Method Reader.TestFollow
has 173 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (tr Reader) TestFollow(t *testing.T) {
// Reader sends all logs and closes after logger is closed
// - Starting from empty log (like run)
for i, tail := range []int{-1, 0, 1, 42} {
i, tail := i, tail
Method puller.pullSchema2Layers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *puller) pullSchema2Layers(ctx context.Context, target distribution.Descriptor, layers []distribution.Descriptor, platform *ocispec.Platform) (id digest.Digest, err error) {
if _, err := p.config.ImageStore.Get(ctx, target.Digest); err == nil {
// If the image already exists locally, no need to pull
// anything.
return target.Digest, nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function skipAgent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipAgent(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function skipNetworkdb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipNetworkdb(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function skipOverlay
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipOverlay(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"