Showing 37 of 37 total issues
Class CLI
has 49 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class CLI < Thor
class_option :merge, type: :string, desc: "tfstate file to merge"
class_option :overwrite, type: :boolean, desc: "Overwrite existing tfstate"
class_option :tfstate, type: :boolean, desc: "Generate tfstate"
class_option :profile, type: :string, desc: "AWS credentials profile"
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Resource
class IAMRolePolicy
include Terraforming::Util
def self.tf(client: Aws::IAM::Client.new)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 148.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Resource
class IAMUserPolicy
include Terraforming::Util
def self.tf(client: Aws::IAM::Client.new)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 148.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method tfstate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
records.inject({}) do |resources, r|
record, zone_id = r[:record], r[:zone_id]
counter = r[:counter]
record_id = record_id_of(record, zone_id)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class DynamoDB
has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class DynamoDB
include Terraforming::Util
def self.tf(client: Aws::DynamoDB::Client.new)
self.new(client).tf
end
Method tfstate
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
auto_scaling_groups.inject({}) do |resources, group|
vpc_zone_specified = vpc_zone_specified?(group)
attributes = {
Method tfstate
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
instances.inject({}) do |resources, instance|
in_vpc = in_vpc?(instance)
block_devices = block_devices_of(instance)
Method tfstate
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
db_instances.inject({}) do |resources, instance|
attributes = {
"address" => instance.endpoint.address,
"allocated_storage" => instance.allocated_storage.to_s,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def global_index_non_key_attributes(global_sec_index)
attributes = {}
if !global_sec_index["projection"]["non_key_attributes"].nil?
hashcode = global_index_hashcode(global_sec_index)
attributes = {"global_secondary_index.#{hashcode}.non_key_attributes.#" => global_sec_index["projection"]["non_key_attributes"].length.to_s}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def local_index_non_key_attributes(local_sec_index)
attributes = {}
if !local_sec_index["projection"]["non_key_attributes"].nil?
hashcode = local_index_hashcode(local_sec_index)
attributes = {"local_secondary_index.#{hashcode}.non_key_attributes.#" => local_sec_index["projection"]["non_key_attributes"].length.to_s}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method tfstate
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
records.inject({}) do |resources, r|
record, zone_id = r[:record], r[:zone_id]
counter = r[:counter]
record_id = record_id_of(record, zone_id)
Method tfstate
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
load_balancers.inject({}) do |resources, load_balancer|
load_balancer_attributes = load_balancer_attributes_of(load_balancer)
attributes = {
"availability_zones.#" => load_balancer.availability_zones.length.to_s,
Method tfstate
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
cache_clusters.inject({}) do |resources, cache_cluster|
attributes = {
"cache_nodes.#" => cache_cluster.cache_nodes.length.to_s,
"cluster_id" => cache_cluster.cache_cluster_id,
Method tfstate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
instances.inject({}) do |resources, instance|
in_vpc = in_vpc?(instance)
block_devices = block_devices_of(instance)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tfstate
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
tables.inject({}) do |resources, dynamo_db_table|
attributes = {
"arn" => dynamo_db_table["table_arn"],
"id" => dynamo_db_table["table_name"],
Method tfstate
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
launch_configurations.inject({}) do |resources, lc|
attributes = {
"name" => lc.launch_configuration_name,
"image_id" => lc.image_id,
Method tfstate
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
clusters.inject({}) do |resources, cluster|
attributes = {
"cluster_identifier" => cluster.cluster_identifier,
"cluster_type" => cluster.number_of_nodes == 1 ? "single-node" : "multi-node",
Method permission_attributes_of
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def permission_attributes_of(security_group, permission, type)
hashcode = permission_hashcode_of(security_group, permission)
security_groups = security_groups_in(permission, security_group).reject do |identifier|
[security_group.group_name, security_group.group_id].include?(identifier)
end
Method tfstate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
subscriptions.reject { |x| x["Protocol"].include?("email") }
.inject({}) do |resources, subscription|
attributes = {
"id" => subscription["SubscriptionArn"],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def tfstate
cache_subnet_groups.inject({}) do |resources, cache_subnet_group|
attributes = {
"description" => cache_subnet_group.cache_subnet_group_description,
"name" => cache_subnet_group.cache_subnet_group_name,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 38.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76