Sign upLogin

dtaniwaki/e2e-tester

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 259 of 259 total issues

Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing
Open

    rack (2.0.1)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-44571

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/releases/tag/v3.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.2, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.2, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.6.1, ~> 2.2.6, >= 3.0.4.1

Broken Access Control vulnerability in Active Job
Open

    activejob (5.0.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-16476

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/FL4dSdzr2zw

Solution: upgrade to ~> 4.2.11, ~> 5.0.7.1, ~> 5.1.6.1, ~> 5.1.7, >= 5.2.1.1

Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack
Open

    rack (2.0.1)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-16471

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/NAalCee8n6o

Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.6.11, >= 2.0.6

rack-protection gem timing attack vulnerability when validating CSRF token
Open

    rack-protection (1.5.3)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-1000119

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/sinatra/rack-protection/pull/98

Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.5.5, >= 2.0.0

Directory Traversal in rubyzip
Open

    rubyzip (1.2.0)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-1000544

Criticality: Critical

URL: https://github.com/rubyzip/rubyzip/issues/369

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.2.2

Denial of Service Vulnerability in Action View
Open

    actionview (5.0.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2019-5419

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/GN7w9fFAQeI

Solution: upgrade to >= 6.0.0.beta3, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11

Denial of service via multipart parsing in Rack
Open

    rack (2.0.1)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-44572

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/releases/tag/v3.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.2, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.2, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.6.1, ~> 2.2.6, >= 3.0.4.1

Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
Open

    rack (2.0.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-30122

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/g/ruby-security-ann/c/L2Axto442qk

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.1, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.1, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.3.1

Possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability
Open

    rack (2.0.1)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2019-16782

Criticality: Medium

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-hrqr-hxpp-chr3

Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.6.12, >= 2.0.8

ruby-ffi DDL loading issue on Windows OS
Open

    ffi (1.9.10)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-1000201

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/ffi/ffi/releases/tag/1.9.24

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.9.24

Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
Open

    rack (2.0.1)
Severity: Minor
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-44570

URL: https://github.com/rack/rack/releases/tag/v3.0.4.1

Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.9.2, ~> 2.0.9, >= 2.1.4.2, ~> 2.1.4, >= 2.2.6.2, ~> 2.2.6, >= 3.0.4.1

Regular Expression Denial of Service in websocket-extensions (RubyGem)
Open

    websocket-extensions (0.1.2)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2020-7663

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/faye/websocket-extensions-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-g6wq-qcwm-j5g2

Solution: upgrade to >= 0.1.5

TZInfo relative path traversal vulnerability allows loading of arbitrary files
Open

    tzinfo (1.2.2)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2022-31163

Criticality: High

URL: https://github.com/tzinfo/tzinfo/security/advisories/GHSA-5cm2-9h8c-rvfx

Solution: upgrade to ~> 0.3.61, >= 1.2.10

Flaw in yajl-ruby gem may cause a DoS
Open

    yajl-ruby (1.3.0)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2017-16516

Criticality: High

URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16516

Solution: upgrade to >= 1.3.1

Path Traversal in Sprockets
Open

    sprockets (3.7.1)
Severity: Critical
Found in Gemfile.lock by bundler-audit

Advisory: CVE-2018-3760

Criticality: High

URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/2S9Pwz2i16k

Solution: upgrade to < 3.0.0, >= 2.12.5, < 4.0.0, >= 3.7.2, >= 4.0.0.beta8

Method update_source has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.update_source
      browsers = [
        {
          browser: 'phantomjs',
          device: 'desktop'
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/browser/local.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method serialized_attribute has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def serialized_attribute(*names)
      options = names.extract_options!
      names.each do |name|
        name = name.to_s
        serialized_attribute_keys << name
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/concerns/serialized_attribute.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_pagination_header has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def set_pagination_header(records, params = request.params)
        links = []
        links << %(<#{url_for(params.merge(page: records.next_page))}>; rel="next") unless records.last_page?
        links << %(<#{url_for(params.merge(page: records.total_pages))}>; rel="last") unless records.last_page?
        links << %(<#{url_for(params.merge(page: 1))}>; rel="first") unless records.first_page?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/api/v1/base_controller.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method same_test_step_set? has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def same_test_step_set?(other)
    return false if other.nil?
    return false if self.class != other.class
    return false if test_steps.length != other.test_steps.length
    return false if test_steps.map { |ts| ts.becomes ts.type.constantize }.zip(other.test_steps.map { |ts| ts.becomes ts.type.constantize }).any? { |a, b| !a.same_step?(b) }
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/test_step_set.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method assign_token has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def assign_token
    token_columns.each do |column_name|
      10.times do
        token = SecureRandom.urlsafe_base64(32)
        unless TestExecutionShare.where(column_name => token).exists?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/concerns/generate_token_concern.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language