Showing 405 of 405 total issues
Method toSlack
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
$message = (new SlackMessage)
->content('A Moon Mining Extraction has been successfully completed.')
->from('SeAT Moon Tracker')
Method toSlack
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
$message = (new SlackMessage)
->content('A Moon Mining Extraction has been started.')
->from('SeAT Moon Tracker')
Method toSlack
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
return (new SlackMessage)
->content('A structure service has been shutdown!')
->from('SeAT Structure Monitor')
Method toSlack
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
return (new SlackMessage)
->content('A sovereignty structure has been reinforced!')
->from('SeAT Sovereignty Health')
Method toSlack
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
return (new SlackMessage)
->from('SeAT War Observer')
->content('A war has been invalidated!')
Method toSlack
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
$message = (new SlackMessage)
->content('A kill has been recorded for your corporation!')
Method toSlack
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toSlack($notifiable)
{
return (new SlackMessage)
->from('SeAT Alliance Weather')
->content('Capital has been modified!')
Avoid variables with short names like $id. Configured minimum length is 3. Open
public function zKillBoardToSlackLink(string $type, int $id, string $name): string
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ShortVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, local, or parameter has a very short name.
Example
class Something {
private $q = 15; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $as ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$r = 20 + $this->q; // VIOLATION - Local
for (int $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { // Not a Violation (inside FOR)
$r += $this->q;
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#shortvariable
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$attachment->field(function ($field) {
$system = MapDenormalize::find($this->notification->text['solarsystemID']);
$field->title('System')
->content(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 95.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$attachment->field(function ($field) {
$system = MapDenormalize::find($this->notification->text['solarSystemID']);
$field->title('System')
->content(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 95.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
The class GroupsController has a coupling between objects value of 16. Consider to reduce the number of dependencies under 13. Open
class GroupsController extends Controller
{
/**
* @param \Seat\Notifications\Http\DataTables\NotificationGroupDataTable $data_table
* @return \Illuminate\Contracts\View\Factory|\Illuminate\View\View
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CouplingBetweenObjects
Since: 1.1.0
A class with too many dependencies has negative impacts on several quality aspects of a class. This includes quality criteria like stability, maintainability and understandability
Example
class Foo {
/**
* @var \foo\bar\X
*/
private $x = null;
/**
* @var \foo\bar\Y
*/
private $y = null;
/**
* @var \foo\bar\Z
*/
private $z = null;
public function setFoo(\Foo $foo) {}
public function setBar(\Bar $bar) {}
public function setBaz(\Baz $baz) {}
/**
* @return \SplObjectStorage
* @throws \OutOfRangeException
* @throws \InvalidArgumentException
* @throws \ErrorException
*/
public function process(\Iterator $it) {}
// ...
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/design.html#couplingbetweenobjects
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$attachment
->field(function ($field) {
$alliance = Alliance::firstOrNew(
['alliance_id' => $this->notification->text['allianceID']],
['name' => trans('web::seat.unknown')]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$attachment
->field(function ($field) {
$corporation = UniverseName::firstOrNew(
['entity_id' => $this->notification->text['corpID']],
['name' => trans('web::seat.unknown')]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function toMail
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function toMail($notifiable)
{
$mail = (new MailMessage)
->subject('Character Left Corp Notification!')
->line('A character has left the corporation!');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid using static access to class '\Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema' in method 'down'. Open
Schema::dropIfExists('notification_histories');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class '\Seat\Notifications\Models\NotificationGroup' in method 'store'. Open
NotificationGroup::create([
'name' => $request->input('name'),
]);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class '\Seat\Notifications\Models\Integration' in method 'getEditGroup'. Open
$integrations = Integration::all();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid unused parameters such as '$notifiable'. Open
public function toArray($notifiable)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
UnusedFormalParameter
Since: 0.2
Avoid passing parameters to methods or constructors and then not using those parameters.
Example
class Foo
{
private function bar($howdy)
{
// $howdy is not used
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/unusedcode.html#unusedformalparameter
Avoid using static access to class '\Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema' in method 'down'. Open
Schema::dropIfExists('integrations');
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class '\Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema' in method 'up'. Open
Schema::table('notification_groups', function (Blueprint $table) {
$table->dropColumn('type');
});
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}