Showing 71 of 71 total issues
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
@time_tracker = get_current_time_tracker
@limit = 15 # limit for both lists
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
query_from_id
time_logs_query
unless User.current.allowed_to_globally?(:tt_edit_time_logs, {})
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if operator == "="
"( #{TimeBooking.table_name}.project_id IN (" + value.collect { |val| "'#{connection.quote_string(val)}'" }.join(",") + ") )"
else
"( #{TimeBooking.table_name}.project_id NOT IN (" + value.collect { |val| "'#{connection.quote_string(val)}'" }.join(",") + ") OR #{TimeBooking.table_name}.project_id IS NULL )"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if operator == "="
"( #{Issue.table_name}.fixed_version_id IN (" + value.collect { |val| "'#{connection.quote_string(val)}'" }.join(",") + ") )"
else
"( #{Issue.table_name}.fixed_version_id NOT IN (" + value.collect { |val| "'#{connection.quote_string(val)}'" }.join(",") + ") OR #{Issue.table_name}.fixed_version_id IS NULL )"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete
time_tracker = TimeTracker.where(:id => params[:id]).first
if User.current.id == time_tracker.user_id && User.current.allowed_to?([:tt_edit_own_time_logs], {}) || User.current.allowed_to_globally?([:tt_edit_time_logs], {}) # user could only delete his own entries, except he's admin
time_tracker.destroy
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tt_sort_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tt_sort_link(sort_arg, column, caption, default_order)
css, order = nil, default_order
tt_sort_criteria = @sort_logs_criteria if sort_arg == :sort_logs
tt_sort_criteria = @sort_bookings_criteria if sort_arg == :sort_bookings
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method span
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def span
if op == 'is' || op == 'today'
'day'
elsif op == 'thisWeek' || op == 'between' && self.last_start == self.last_start.beginning_of_week && self.last_stop == self.last_stop.end_of_week
'week'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize_available_filters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_available_filters
principals = []
if project
principals += project.principals.sort
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise StandardError, l(:tt_error_not_allowed_to_change_logs) if self.user.id == User.current.id
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise StandardError, l(:tt_error_not_allowed_to_change_logs) if self.user.id == User.current.id
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@query = TimeBookingQuery.new(params[:query])
@query.user = User.current
@query.project = params[:query_is_for_all] ? nil : @project
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@query = TimeLogQuery.new(params[:query])
@query.user = User.current
@query.project = params[:query_is_for_all] ? nil : @project
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_booking
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_booking(args = {})
default_args = {:started_on => self.started_on, :stopped_at => self.stopped_at, :comments => self.comments, :activity_id => args[:activity_id], :issue => nil, :spent_time => nil, :project_id => self.project_id}
args = default_args.merge(args)
# TODO check time boundaries
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise StandardError, l(:tt_error_not_allowed_to_change_logs) if self.user.id == User.current.id
Method visible?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def visible?(user=User.current)
return true if user.admin?
return false unless project.nil? || user.allowed_to?(@visible_permission, project)
case visibility
when Query::VISIBILITY_PUBLIC
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
map.permission :tt_edit_bookings, {:time_bookings => [:actions, :delete, :get_list_entry, :show_edit, :update],
:time_logs => [:show_booking],
:tt_bookings_list => [:index],
:tt_completer => [:get_issue, :get_issue_id, :get_issue_subject],
:tt_date_shifter => [:get_next_time_span, :get_prev_time_span],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
map.permission :tt_edit_own_bookings, {:time_bookings => [:actions, :delete, :get_list_entry, :show_edit, :update],
:time_logs => [:show_booking],
:tt_bookings_list => [:index],
:tt_completer => [:get_issue, :get_issue_id, :get_issue_subject],
:tt_date_shifter => [:get_next_time_span, :get_prev_time_span],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@query.attributes = params[:query]
@query.project = nil if params[:query_is_for_all]
@query.is_public = false unless User.current.allowed_to?(:manage_public_queries, @project) || User.current.admin?
@query.build_from_params(params)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@time_tracker = get_current
@time_tracker.update_attributes!(params[:time_tracker])
flash[:notice] = l(:update_time_tracker_success)
unless request.xhr?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sql_for_tt_log_bookable_field
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sql_for_tt_log_bookable_field(field, operator, value = ["1"])
case operator
when "="
if value[0] == "1"
"#{TimeLog.table_name}.bookable = " + connection.quoted_true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"