flant/superhosting

View on GitHub
lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Method alternative_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def alternative_name(name:)
        def container_candidate(parts, candidates)
          parts = parts.dup
          candidates = candidates.dup

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method container_candidate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def container_candidate(parts, candidates)
          parts = parts.dup
          candidates = candidates.dup

          candidate = [parts.shift]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Use each_key instead of each.
Open

        mysql_db_controller.container_dbs(container_name: container_name).each { |db_name, _grants| mysql_db_controller._delete(name: db_name) }

This cop checks for uses of each_key and each_value Hash methods.

Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.

Example:

# bad
hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
hash.values.each { |v| p v }
hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
hash.each { |_k, v| p v }

# good
hash.each_key { |k| p k }
hash.each_value { |v| p v }

Use each_key instead of each.
Open

        mysql_user_controller.container_users(container_name: container_name).each { |user_name, _grants| mysql_user_controller._delete(name: user_name) }

This cop checks for uses of each_key and each_value Hash methods.

Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.

Example:

# bad
hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
hash.values.each { |v| p v }
hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
hash.each { |_k, v| p v }

# good
hash.each_key { |k| p k }
hash.each_value { |v| p v }

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def _revoke(user_name:, database_name:)
        user_controller = controller(User)
        container_name = user_name.split('_').first

        debug_operation(desc: { code: :mysql_grant, data: { database: database_name, name:  user_name } }) do |&blk|
Severity: Major
Found in lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb on lines 75..86

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def _grant(user_name:, database_name:)
        user_controller = controller(User)
        container_name = user_name.split('_').first

        debug_operation(desc: { code: :mysql_grant, data: { database: database_name, name:  user_name } }) do |&blk|
Severity: Major
Found in lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb on lines 99..110

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def grant(user_name:, database_name:)
        user_controller = controller(User)
        database_controller = controller(Db)
        if (resp = user_controller.existing_validation(name: user_name)).net_status_ok? &&
           (resp = database_controller.existing_validation(name: database_name)).net_status_ok?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb on lines 89..96

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def revoke(user_name:, database_name:)
        user_controller = controller(User)
        database_controller = controller(Db)
        if (resp = user_controller.existing_validation(name: user_name)).net_status_ok? &&
           (resp = database_controller.existing_validation(name: database_name)).net_status_ok?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
lib/superhosting/controller/mysql.rb on lines 65..72

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Use || instead of or.
Open

            break if candidates.one? { |c| c == candidate.join('_') } or candidates.empty?

This cop checks for uses of and and or, and suggests using && and || instead. It can be configured to check only in conditions, or in all contexts.

Example: EnforcedStyle: always (default)

# bad
foo.save and return

# bad
if foo and bar
end

# good
foo.save && return

# good
if foo && bar
end

Example: EnforcedStyle: conditionals

# bad
if foo and bar
end

# good
foo.save && return

# good
foo.save and return

# good
if foo && bar
end

Unnecessary spacing detected.
Open

        debug_operation(desc: { code: :mysql_grant, data: { database: database_name, name:  user_name } }) do |&blk|

This cop checks for extra/unnecessary whitespace.

Example:

# good if AllowForAlignment is true
name      = "RuboCop"
# Some comment and an empty line

website  += "/bbatsov/rubocop" unless cond
puts        "rubocop"          if     debug

# bad for any configuration
set_app("RuboCop")
website  = "https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop"

Line is too long. [154/150]
Open

        mysql_user_controller.container_users(container_name: container_name).each { |user_name, _grants| mysql_user_controller._delete(name: user_name) }

Unnecessary spacing detected.
Open

        debug_operation(desc: { code: :mysql_grant, data: { database: database_name, name:  user_name } }) do |&blk|

This cop checks for extra/unnecessary whitespace.

Example:

# good if AllowForAlignment is true
name      = "RuboCop"
# Some comment and an empty line

website  += "/bbatsov/rubocop" unless cond
puts        "rubocop"          if     debug

# bad for any configuration
set_app("RuboCop")
website  = "https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop"

Method definitions must not be nested. Use lambda instead.
Open

        def container_candidate(parts, candidates)
          parts = parts.dup
          candidates = candidates.dup

          candidate = [parts.shift]

This cop checks for nested method definitions.

Example:

# bad

# `bar` definition actually produces methods in the same scope
# as the outer `foo` method. Furthermore, the `bar` method
# will be redefined every time `foo` is invoked.
def foo
  def bar
  end
end

Example:

# good

def foo
  bar = -> { puts 'hello' }
  bar.call
end

Example:

# good

def foo
  self.class_eval do
    def bar
    end
  end
end

def foo
  self.module_exec do
    def bar
    end
  end
end

Example:

# good

def foo
  class << self
    def bar
    end
  end
end

Redundant curly braces around a hash parameter.
Open

        raise NetStatus::Exception, { code: :container_name_is_not_specified }

This cop checks for braces around the last parameter in a method call if the last parameter is a hash. It supports braces, no_braces and context_dependent styles.

Example: EnforcedStyle: braces

# The `braces` style enforces braces around all method
# parameters that are hashes.

# bad
some_method(x, y, a: 1, b: 2)

# good
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2})

Example: EnforcedStyle: no_braces (default)

# The `no_braces` style checks that the last parameter doesn't
# have braces around it.

# bad
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2})

# good
some_method(x, y, a: 1, b: 2)

Example: EnforcedStyle: context_dependent

# The `context_dependent` style checks that the last parameter
# doesn't have braces around it, but requires braces if the
# second to last parameter is also a hash literal.

# bad
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2})
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2}, a: 1, b: 2)

# good
some_method(x, y, a: 1, b: 2)
some_method(x, y, {a: 1, b: 2}, {a: 1, b: 2})

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status