Method _add_custom
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _add_custom(name:, group:, shell: '/usr/sbin/nologin', home_dir: "/web/#{group}", uid: nil)
debug_operation(desc: { code: :user, data: { name: name } }) do |&blk|
if _get(name: name)
blk.call(code: :ok)
{}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _del
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _del(name:, group:)
debug_operation(desc: { code: :user, data: { name: name } }) do |&blk|
with_dry_run do |dry_run|
resp = {}
with_adding_group = _group_get_users(name: group).one? ? true : false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _create_password
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _create_password(generate: false)
if generate
password = SecureRandom.hex
else
loop do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
%w
-literals should be delimited by [
and ]
. Open
user_gid, user_uid = dry_run ? %w(XXXX XXXX) : [user.gid, user.uid]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop enforces the consistent usage of %
-literal delimiters.
Specify the 'default' key to set all preferred delimiters at once. You can continue to specify individual preferred delimiters to override the default.
Example:
# Style/PercentLiteralDelimiters:
# PreferredDelimiters:
# default: '[]'
# '%i': '()'
# good
%w[alpha beta] + %i(gamma delta)
# bad
%W(alpha #{beta})
# bad
%I(alpha beta)
Use 2 (not 1) spaces for indentation. Open
loop do
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks for indentation that doesn't use the specified number of spaces.
See also the IndentationConsistency cop which is the companion to this one.
Example:
# bad
class A
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
# good
class A
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
Example: IgnoredPatterns: ['^\s*module']
# bad
module A
class B
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
end
# good
module A
class B
def test
puts 'hello'
end
end
end