Showing 460 of 460 total issues
Method []
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def [](service)
@@connections ||= Hash.new do |hash, key|
hash[key] = case key
when :auto_scale
Fog::Rackspace::AutoScale.new
Method generate_configure_vm_request
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_configure_vm_request(vm_data)
xmlns = 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1'
xmlns_vcloud = 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1'
xmlns_rasd = 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1/cim-schema/2/CIM_ResourceAllocationSettingData'
xmlns_vssd = 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1/cim-schema/2/CIM_VirtualSystemSettingData'
Method get_org_vdc_gateways
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_org_vdc_gateways(vdc_id)
unless data[:vdcs][vdc_id]
raise Fog::Compute::VcloudDirector::Forbidden.new(
"No access to entity \"(com.vmware.vcloud.entity.vdc:#{vdc_id})\"."
)
Method vm_allocate
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vm_allocate(attr={ })
if(attr[:flavor].nil?)
raise(ArgumentError.new("Attribute flavor is nil! #{attr.inspect}"))
end
Method get_network_complete
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_network_complete(id)
unless network = data[:networks][id]
raise Fog::Compute::VcloudDirector::Forbidden.new(
'This operation is denied.'
)
Method post_upload_disk
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_upload_disk(id, name, size, options={})
unless size.to_s =~ /^\d+$/
raise Fog::Compute::VcloudDirector::BadRequest.new(
"validation error on field 'diskSpec.sizeBytes': must be greater than or equal to 0"
)
Method get_organizations_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_organizations_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_catalogs_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_catalogs_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_users_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_users_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_groups_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_groups_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method list_addresses
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_addresses
# Loop through addresses and update states and values if they aren't set
self.data[:addresses].values.each do |address|
address['state'] = 2 if address['state'] == 0
address['ip'] = Fog::IBM::Mock.ip_address if address['ip'].empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_disks_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_disks_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_medias_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_medias_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_vapp_templates_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp_templates_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method list_groups
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_groups(filter={})
groups = []
net1 = mock_group "1", 'net1'
net2 = mock_group "2", 'fogtest'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_vapps_in_lease_from_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapps_in_lease_from_query(options={})
query = []
query << "sortAsc=#{options[:sortAsc]}" if options[:sortAsc]
query << "sortDesc=#{options[:sortDesc]}" if options[:sortDesc]
query << "page=#{options[:page]}" if options[:page]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Compute
class CloudSigma
class Real
def clone_snapshot(snap_id, clone_params={})
request(:path => "snapshots/#{snap_id}/action/",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Compute
class CloudSigma
class Real
def clone_libvolume(vol_id, clone_params={})
request(:path => "libdrives/#{vol_id}/action/",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method list_groups
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_groups(filter = {})
groups=[]
grouppool = ::OpenNebula::GroupPool.new(client)
grouppool.info
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Compute
class CloudSigma
class Real
def clone_volume(vol_id, clone_params={})
request(:path => "drives/#{vol_id}/action/",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76