Showing 460 of 460 total issues
Method post_update_catalog_item_metadata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_catalog_item_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_update_vapp_metadata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_vapp_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method all
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def all
self.href = service.default_vdc_href unless self.href
data = nil
if self.href =~ /\/vdc\//
check_href!("Vdc")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method slurp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.slurp(error, service=nil)
major_error_code = nil
message = nil
minor_error_code = nil
stack_trace = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_update_disk_metadata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_disk_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method start
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def start
if is_running?
message="VNC server already running"
STDERR.puts message
@logger.info message
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_update_media_metadata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_media_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method slurp
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.slurp(error, service=nil)
major_error_code = nil
message = nil
minor_error_code = nil
stack_trace = nil
Method parse_end_element
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_end_element(name, vm)
case name
when 'IpAddress'
vm[:ip_address] = value
when 'Description'
Method get_current_session
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_current_session
body =
{:href => make_href('session/'),
:type => 'application/vnd.vmware.vcloud.session+xml',
:org => data[:org][:name],
Method []
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def [](service)
@@connections ||= Hash.new do |hash, key|
hash[key] = case key
when :compute
Fog::Logger.warning("OpenStack[:compute] is not recommended, use Compute[:openstack] for portability")
Method class_for
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def class_for(key)
case key
when :auto_scale
Fog::Rackspace::AutoScale
when :block_storage
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class << self
def class_for(key)
case key
when :dns
Fog::DNS::Dreamhost
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class << self
def class_for(key)
case key
when :dns
Fog::DNS::Rage4
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class << self
def class_for(key)
case key
when :compute
Fog::Compute::Clodo
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class << self
def class_for(key)
case key
when :dns
Fog::DNS::DNSMadeEasy
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method populate_images
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.populate_images
images = {}
images["20010001"] = {
"name"=>"SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 for x86",
"manifest"=>"https://www-147.ibm.com/cloud/enterprise/ram.ws/RAMSecure/artifact/{6CD09CE4-E99B-D72F-6C29-233C9B2A1676}/1.0/parameters.xml",
Method post_update_vapp_metadata
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_vapp_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
Method post_update_catalog_item_metadata
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_catalog_item_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'
Method post_update_disk_metadata
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_update_disk_metadata(id, metadata={})
body = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do
attrs = {
:xmlns => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'