Showing 915 of 915 total issues
File html-utils.js
has 421 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function() {
var $ = require('cheerio');
var _ = require('underscore');
Function xhr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
xhr: function(method, url, headers, data, callback) {
var r = new XMLHttpRequest();
var error = this.error;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function append
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
append: function(node, attr, target) {
var n = typeof (node) === 'string' ? document.createElement(node) : node;
if (typeof (attr) === 'object') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var result = {
'previousView': 'day',
'currentView': 'hour',
'nextView': configuration.minView === 'hour' ? 'setTime' : 'minute',
'previousViewDate': new DateObject({
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 156.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var result = {
'previousView': 'year',
'currentView': 'month',
'nextView': configuration.minView === 'month' ? 'setTime' : 'day',
'previousViewDate': new DateObject({
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 156.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function postTweet
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$rootScope.root.postTweet = function() {
var message = $rootScope.root.tweet;
var tweetLen = twttr.txt.getTweetLength(message);
var tweet = encodeURIComponent(message);
Function postTweet
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$rootScope.root.postTweet = function() {
var message = $rootScope.root.tweet;
var tweetLen = twttr.txt.getTweetLength(message);
var tweet = encodeURIComponent(message);
Function exports
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function(app){
app.get('/tests/run/:plugin', function(req, res, next) {
if (req.params.plugin == "all") {
Function googleChartDirective
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function googleChartDirective($timeout, $window, $rootScope, googleChartApiPromise) {
GoogleChartController.$inject = ['$scope', '$element', '$attrs', '$injector', 'FormatManager'];
function GoogleChartController($scope, $element, $attrs, $injector, FormatManager){
File wallDisplay.js
has 412 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'use strict';
/* global angular */
/* jshint unused:false */
var controllersModule = require('./_index');
Function run
has 146 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var run = core.run = function(uri, options, cb) {
if (typeof options === 'function') {
cb = options;
options = {};
Function api
has 145 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
hello.api = function() {
// Shorthand
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;
Function mapLayoutDirective
has 142 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function mapLayoutDirective(MapPopUpTemplateService, $interval, $location, MapCreationService) {
return {
scope: {
data: '=',
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (meta) {
var isJetpack = meta.twitter && meta.twitter.card === 'jetpack';
var isWordpress = meta.generator && /wordpress/i.test(meta.generator);
var isShopify = false;
Function GoogleChartController
has 141 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function GoogleChartController($scope, $element, $attrs, $injector, FormatManager){
var self = this;
var resizeHandler, wrapperListeners = {}, formatManager,
chartListeners = {}, innerVisualization = null;
self.registerChartListener = registerChartListener;
Function $get
has 139 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function($interval, $log, $rootScope, $document, Keepalive, LocalStorage, $window) {
var state = {
idle: null,
timeout: null,
idling: false,
Function login
has 138 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
login: function() {
// Create an object which inherits its parent as the prototype and constructs a new event chain.
var _this = this;
var utils = _this.utils;
Function SearchService
has 138 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function SearchService($q, $http, $rootScope, AppSettings) {
var service = {};
$rootScope.root.numberOfFailedReq = 0;
Function Event
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Event: function() {
var separator = /[\s\,]+/;
// If this doesn't support getPrototype then we can't get prototype.events of the parent
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getOembed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.getOembed = function(uri, data, options) {
if (!data) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"