Function merge_consecutive_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_consecutive_type(
elem: Element,
doc: Doc,
ElementType: type[EmphLike] = pf.Emph,
) -> list[EmphLike] | None:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if isinstance(elem_next_next, ElementType):
merged = list(elem_cur.content) + [pf.Space] + list(elem_next_next.content)
content = list(content[:i]) + [ElementType(*merged)] + list(content[i + 3 :])
mutated = True
if mutated:
Function cancel_repeated_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cancel_repeated_type(
elem: Element,
doc: Doc,
ElementType: type[EmphLike] = pf.Emph,
) -> list[EmphLike] | None:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cite_to_ref
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cite_to_ref(elem: pf.Cite, doc: Doc, check_id: dict[str, str] | None = None) -> pf.RawInline | None:
"""Cite to raw LaTeX ref/eqref.
:param check_id: if provided, transform only if id is in `check_id`
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"