Showing 84 of 84 total issues
Method run_rescue_handler
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_rescue_handler(handler, error, endpoint)
if handler.instance_of?(Symbol)
raise NoMethodError, "undefined method '#{handler}'" unless respond_to?(handler)
handler = public_method(handler)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method declared_hash_attr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def declared_hash_attr(passed_params, options, declared_param, params_nested_path, memo)
renamed_params = route_setting(:renamed_params) || {}
if declared_param.is_a?(Hash)
declared_param.each_pair do |declared_parent_param, declared_children_params|
params_nested_path_dup = params_nested_path.dup
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rotation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rotation(env, exact_route = nil)
response = nil
input, method = *extract_input_and_method(env)
map[method].each do |route|
next if exact_route == route
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_body_input
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_body_input
return unless
(request.post? || request.put? || request.patch? || request.delete?) &&
(!request.form_data? || !request.media_type) &&
!request.parseable_data? &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method namespace
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def namespace(space = nil, options = {}, &block)
@namespace_description = nil unless instance_variable_defined?(:@namespace_description) && @namespace_description
if space || block
within_namespace do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_passed_param
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_passed_param(params_nested_path, has_passed_children = false, &_block)
return yield if has_passed_children
key = params_nested_path[0]
key += "[#{params_nested_path[1..].join('][')}]" if params_nested_path.size > 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method meets_hash_dependency?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def meets_hash_dependency?(params)
# params might be anything what looks like a hash, so it must implement a `key?` method
return false unless params.respond_to?(:key?)
@dependent_on.each do |dependency|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new_scope
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new_scope(attrs, optional = false, &block)
# if required params are grouped and no type or unsupported type is provided, raise an error
type = attrs[1] ? attrs[1][:type] : nil
if attrs.first && !optional
raise Grape::Exceptions::MissingGroupType if type.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rescue_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_from(*args, &block)
if args.last.is_a?(Proc)
handler = args.pop
elsif block
handler = block
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method entity_class_for_obj
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def entity_class_for_obj(object, options)
entity_class = options.delete(:with)
if entity_class.nil?
# entity class not explicitly defined, auto-detect from relation#klass or first object in the collection
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method map_params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def map_params(params, element, is_array = false)
if params.is_a?(Array)
params.map do |el|
map_params(el, element, true)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rescue_from
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rescue_from(*args, &block)
if args.last.is_a?(Proc)
handler = args.pop
elsif block
handler = block
Method declared_hash_attr
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def declared_hash_attr(passed_params, options, declared_param, params_nested_path, memo)
renamed_params = route_setting(:renamed_params) || {}
if declared_param.is_a?(Hash)
declared_param.each_pair do |declared_parent_param, declared_children_params|
params_nested_path_dup = params_nested_path.dup
Method enforce_symbolized_keys
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enforce_symbolized_keys(type, method)
# Collections have all values processed individually
if [Array, Set].include?(type)
lambda do |val|
method.call(val).tap do |new_val|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_param!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_param!(attr_name, params)
return unless params.respond_to?(:key?) && params.key?(attr_name)
return if Array.wrap(params[attr_name]).all? { |param| param.nil? || param.to_s.match?((options_key?(:value) ? @option[:value] : @option)) }
raise Grape::Exceptions::Validation.new(params: [@scope.full_name(attr_name)], message: message(:regexp))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_param!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_param!(attr_name, params)
return unless params.respond_to?(:key?) && params.key?(attr_name)
excepts = @except.is_a?(Proc) ? @except.call : @except
return if excepts.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(attrs, options, required, scope, **opts)
if options.is_a?(Hash)
@excepts = options[:except]
@values = options[:value]
@proc = options[:proc]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method version
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def version(*args, &block)
if args.any?
options = args.extract_options!
options = options.reverse_merge(using: :path)
requested_versions = args.flatten
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(type, strict = false)
super
@type = type
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_incompatible_option_values
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_incompatible_option_values(default, values, except_values, excepts)
return unless default && !default.is_a?(Proc)
raise Grape::Exceptions::IncompatibleOptionValues.new(:default, default, :values, values) if values && !values.is_a?(Proc) && !Array(default).all? { |def_val| values.include?(def_val) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"