Showing 55 of 55 total issues
Function __init__
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, wrapped, iscalled=True, calls=None, callback=None, extended=False, results=False, recurse_lock=None, binding=None):
Function _rewrap_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _rewrap_method(func, klass, aspect):
if isinstance(func, staticmethod):
if hasattr(func, '__func__'):
return staticmethod(_checked_apply(aspect, func.__func__))
else:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exec_in_env
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exec_in_env():
env_path = join(base_path, ".tox", "bootstrap")
if sys.platform == "win32":
bin_path = join(env_path, "Scripts")
else:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function patch_module
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def patch_module(module, name, replacement, original=UNSPECIFIED, aliases=True, location=None, **_bogus_options):
Function weave_module
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def weave_module(module, aspect, methods=NORMAL_METHODS, lazy=False, bag=BrokenBag, **options):
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for attr, func in sklass.__dict__.items():
if method_matches(attr) and attr not in original and attr not in super_original:
if isroutine(func):
logdebug("@ patching attribute %r (from superclass: %s, original: %r).", attr, sklass.__name__, func)
setattr(klass, attr, _rewrap_method(func, sklass, aspect))
Function __init__
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, play, proxy=True, strict=True, dump=True, recurse_lock=False, **options):
Function weave_module
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def weave_module(module, aspect, methods=NORMAL_METHODS, lazy=False, bag=BrokenBag, **options):
"""
Low-level weaver for "whole module weaving".
.. warning:: You should not use this directly.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _callback
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _callback(self, _binding, qualname, args, _kwargs):
_, name = qualname.rsplit('.', 1)
if name == 'log':
level, args = _checkLevel(args[0]), args[1:]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _handle
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _handle(self, binding, name, args, kwargs, wrapped, bind=None):
Function retry
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retry(func=None, retries=5, backoff=None, exceptions=(IOError, OSError, EOFError), cleanup=None, sleep=time.sleep):
Function weave_instance
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def weave_instance(instance, aspect, methods=NORMAL_METHODS, lazy=False, bag=BrokenBag, **options):
Function patch_module_function
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def patch_module_function(module, target, aspect, force_name=None, bag=BrokenBag, **options):
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if name and getattr(builtins, name, None) is target:
if bag.has(target):
return Nothing
return patch_module_function(builtins, target, aspects, **options)
elif PY3 and ismethod(target):
Function _handle
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _handle(self, binding, name, args, kwargs, result):
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return weave_instance(target, aspects, **options)
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return mimic(advising_function_wrapper, cutpoint_function)
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return patch_module_function(builtins, target, aspects, **options)
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
set: lambda obj, aliases: "set([%s])" % ', '.join(repr_ex(i) for i in obj),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return repr(obj)