Showing 76 of 76 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if not allowedge[k]:
kslack = slack(k)
if kslack <= 0:
# edge k has zero slack => it is allowable
allowedge[k] = TrueAvoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if deltatype == -1 or d < delta:
delta = d
deltatype = 3
deltaedge = bestedge[b]
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if bk == -1 or d < bd:
bk = k
bd = d
if DEBUG and (bestedge[v] != -1 or bk != -1) and (bestedge[v] == -1 or bd != slack(bestedge[v])):Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if allowedge[k]:
if label[inblossom[w]] == 0:
# (C1) w is a free vertex;
# label w with T and label its mate with S (R12).
assignLabel(w, 2, p ^ 1)Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if isinstance(kslack, integer_types):
assert (kslack % 2) == 0
d = kslack // 2
else:
d = kslack / 2Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if inblossom[w] != b and label[inblossom[w]] == 1:
d = slack(k)
if bk == -1 or d < bd:
bk = k
bd = dAvoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if deltatype == -1 or d < delta:
delta = d
deltatype = 2
deltaedge = bestedge[v]
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if label[b] == 1:
# top-level S-blossom: z = z + 2*delta
dualvar[b] += delta
elif label[b] == 2:
# top-level T-blossom: z = z - 2*deltaMethod expand_t_blossom has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def expand_t_blossom(b)
assert(@label_end[b]).not_nil
entry_child = @in_blossom[@endpoint[@label_end[b] ^ 1]]
# > Move along the blossom until we get to the base.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method blossom_leaves has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def blossom_leaves(b, ary = [])
if b < @nvertex
ary.push(b)
else
@blossom_children[b].each do |c|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method r has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def r(v, w, label, mate)
# R1. [Match v to w ] Set t <- MATE(v), MATE(v) <- w.
# If MATE(t) != v, return (the path is completely re-matched)
t = mate[v]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method augment has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def augment(m, path)
assert_valid_aug_path(path)
ix = 0
while ix < path.length
i = path[ix]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intersect? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def intersect?(set)
unless set.is_a?(Set)
raise ArgumentError, 'value must be a set'
end
if size < set.size- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method consider_tight_edge has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def consider_tight_edge(k, w, p, v)
augmented = false
if @label[@in_blossom[w]] == LBL_FREE
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method assign_label has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def assign_label(w, t, p = nil)
b = @in_blossom[w]
assert_label(w, LBL_FREE)
assert_label(b, LBL_FREE)
@label[w] = @label[b] = t- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method gabow has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.gabow(mate)
m = new
mate.each_with_index do |n1, ix|
next if n1.nil? || n1 == 0
n2 = mate[n1]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"