Showing 148 of 148 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
test('--version forces exit', () => {
// Mock console.log to not pollute the log with the yargs help text
const mockLog = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation();
initArgs(['https://www.google.com', '--version']);
expect(mockExit).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getAllowedIconFormats
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function getAllowedIconFormats(platform: string): string[] {
const hasIdentify = hasbin.sync('identify') || hasbin.sync('gm');
const hasConvert = hasbin.sync('convert') || hasbin.sync('gm');
const hasIconUtil = hasbin.sync('iconutil');
Function checkApp
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function checkApp(
appRoot: string,
inputOptions: RawOptions,
): Promise<void> {
const arch = inputOptions.arch ? inputOptions.arch : inferArch();
Function convertIconIfNecessary
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function convertIconIfNecessary(options: AppOptions): void {
if (!options.packager.icon) {
log.debug('Option "icon" not set, skipping icon conversion.');
return;
}
Function convertIconIfNecessary
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function convertIconIfNecessary(options: AppOptions): void {
if (!options.packager.icon) {
log.debug('Option "icon" not set, skipping icon conversion.');
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setupSessionInteraction
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setupSessionInteraction(window: BrowserWindow): void {
// See API.md / "Accessing The Electron Session"
ipcMain.on(
'session-interaction',
(event, request: SessionInteractionRequest) => {
Function getLatestSafariVersion
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function getLatestSafariVersion(
url = SAFARI_VERSIONS_HISTORY_URL,
): Promise<SafariVersion> {
try {
log.debug('Grabbing apple version data from', url);
Function injectBookmarks
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function injectBookmarks(menuTemplate: MenuItemConstructorOptions[]): void {
const bookmarkConfigPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'bookmarks.json');
if (!fs.existsSync(bookmarkConfigPath)) {
return;
Function onNewWindowHelper
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function onNewWindowHelper(
options: WindowOptions,
setupWindow: (options: WindowOptions, window: BrowserWindow) => void,
details: HandlerDetails,
parent?: BrowserWindow,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (
options.nativefier.maxWidth &&
options.nativefier.width &&
options.nativefier.width > options.nativefier.maxWidth
) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (
options.nativefier.maxHeight &&
options.nativefier.height &&
options.nativefier.height > options.nativefier.maxHeight
) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function checkApp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function checkApp(
appRoot: string,
inputOptions: RawOptions,
): Promise<void> {
const arch = inputOptions.arch ? inputOptions.arch : inferArch();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createTrayIcon
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function createTrayIcon(
nativefierOptions: OutputOptions,
mainWindow: BrowserWindow,
): Tray | undefined {
const options = { ...nativefierOptions };
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getInfoPListOptions
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getInfoPListOptions(
appResourcesDir: string,
priorOptions: NativefierOptions,
): NativefierOptions {
if (!fileExists(path.join(appResourcesDir, '..', '..', 'Info.plist'))) {
Function injectBookmarks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function injectBookmarks(menuTemplate: MenuItemConstructorOptions[]): void {
const bookmarkConfigPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'bookmarks.json');
if (!fs.existsSync(bookmarkConfigPath)) {
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setupScreenSharePicker
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function setupScreenSharePicker(
resolve: (value: MediaStream | PromiseLike<MediaStream>) => void,
reject: (reason?: unknown) => void,
sources: Electron.DesktopCapturerSource[],
): void {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
test('it should allow non-ascii characters', () => {
const expectedResult = '微信读书';
const param = `${reserved}${expectedResult}`;
const result = sanitizeFilename('', param);
expect(result).toBe(expectedResult);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
test('it should return a result without reserved characters', () => {
const expectedResult = 'abc';
const param = `${reserved}${expectedResult}`;
const result = sanitizeFilename('', param);
expect(result).toBe(expectedResult);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function initContextMenu
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function initContextMenu(
options: OutputOptions,
window?: BrowserWindow,
): void {
log.debug('initContextMenu');
Function onReady
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function onReady(): Promise<void> {
// Warning: `mainWindow` below is the *global* unique `mainWindow`, created at init time
mainWindow = await createMainWindow(appArgs, setDockBadge);
createTrayIcon(appArgs, mainWindow);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"