Showing 2,161 of 2,161 total issues
PoolExistsParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type PoolExistsParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
PoolStopResizeParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type PoolStopResizeParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
JobDeleteParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobDeleteParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
PoolDeleteParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type PoolDeleteParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
JobScheduleDisableParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobScheduleDisableParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
JobListFromJobScheduleParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobListFromJobScheduleParams struct {
/*NrDollarExpand
An OData $expand clause.
JobScheduleExistsParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobScheduleExistsParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
TaskListParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type TaskListParams struct {
/*NrDollarExpand
An OData $expand clause.
FileListFromComputeNodeParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type FileListFromComputeNodeParams struct {
/*NrDollarFilter
An OData $filter clause.
FileGetNodeFilePropertiesFromComputeNodeParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type FileGetNodeFilePropertiesFromComputeNodeParams struct {
/*IfModifiedSince
Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource has been modified since the specified date/time.
JobScheduleTerminateParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobScheduleTerminateParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
FileGetNodeFilePropertiesFromTaskParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type FileGetNodeFilePropertiesFromTaskParams struct {
/*IfModifiedSince
Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource has been modified since the specified date/time.
JobScheduleEnableParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobScheduleEnableParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
JobScheduleDeleteParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobScheduleDeleteParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
FileListFromTaskParams
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type FileListFromTaskParams struct {
/*NrDollarFilter
An OData $filter clause.
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package models
// This file was generated by the swagger tool.
// Editing this file might prove futile when you re-run the swagger generate command
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 239.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package models
// This file was generated by the swagger tool.
// Editing this file might prove futile when you re-run the swagger generate command
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 239.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method TaskReactivateParams.WriteToRequest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *TaskReactivateParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method TaskTerminateParams.WriteToRequest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *TaskTerminateParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method TaskDeleteParams.WriteToRequest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *TaskDeleteParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"