Showing 2,161 of 2,161 total issues
Method JobScheduleUpdateParams.WriteToRequest
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *JobScheduleUpdateParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Method PoolRemoveNodesParams.WriteToRequest
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *PoolRemoveNodesParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Method JobPatchParams.WriteToRequest
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *JobPatchParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Method JobSchedulePatchParams.WriteToRequest
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *JobSchedulePatchParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Function TestRestart
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestRestart(t *testing.T) {
var err error
ctx := context.Background()
m := NewQueueManager()
Method ApplicationListParams.WriteToRequest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *ApplicationListParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TestRestart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestRestart(t *testing.T) {
var err error
ctx := context.Background()
m := NewQueueManager()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package models
// This file was generated by the swagger tool.
// Editing this file might prove futile when you re-run the swagger generate command
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 171.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package models
// This file was generated by the swagger tool.
// Editing this file might prove futile when you re-run the swagger generate command
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 171.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package models
// This file was generated by the swagger tool.
// Editing this file might prove futile when you re-run the swagger generate command
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 171.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function TestList
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestList(t *testing.T) {
var err error
m := NewStorageManager()
ctx := context.Background()
Method QueueService.Queues
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *QueueService) Queues(ctx context.Context, handler cloud.QueueStatusHandler) (err error) {
s.Logger.Println("Retrieving queue names")
statusSet := make(map[string]cloud.QueueStatus)
Function NewBatchService
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewBatchService(ctx context.Context, cfg *Config, logger *log.Logger) (service *BatchService, err error) {
if logger == nil {
logger = log.New(ioutil.Discard, "", log.LstdFlags)
}
Method TaskTerminateParams.WriteToRequest
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *TaskTerminateParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Method TaskReactivateParams.WriteToRequest
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *TaskReactivateParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Method TaskDeleteParams.WriteToRequest
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *TaskDeleteParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Function TestCreateWorkers
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestCreateWorkers(t *testing.T) {
var err error
ctx := context.Background()
m := NewQueueManager()
Function TestCmdRun
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestCmdRun(t *testing.T) {
var err error
tmp, err := ioutil.TempFile("", "")
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mockStorageAccountServer.ServeHTTP
has 17 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (m *mockStorageAccountServer) ServeHTTP(res http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
paths := strings.Split(strings.TrimPrefix(req.URL.Path, "/"), "/")
if len(paths) < 2 {
res.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
Method mockBatchAcountServer.ServeHTTP
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *mockBatchAcountServer) ServeHTTP(res http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
paths := strings.Split(strings.TrimPrefix(req.URL.Path, "/"), "/")
if len(paths) < 2 {
res.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"