Showing 34 of 34 total issues
File diff_match_patch.js
has 641 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function() {
function diff_match_patch() {
this.Diff_Timeout = 1;
this.Diff_EditCost = 4;
this.Match_Threshold = 0.5;
Method complete_internal_references
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete_internal_references(resource, attribute_name)
resource.send(attribute_name).to_s.lines.map do |line|
line.gsub!(/\[(.*?)\]\((@(.+?)-(.+?))\)/) do
caption = $1
url = $2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"" === e[4] ? (f.start2--, f.length2 = 1) : "0" == e[4] ? f.length2 = 0 : (f.start2--, f.length2 =
parseInt(e[4], 10));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"" === e[2] ? (f.start1--, f.length1 = 1) : "0" == e[2] ? f.length1 = 0 : (f.start1--, f.length1 = parseInt(e[2], 10));
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method validate_each
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_each(record, attribute, value)
raise(ArgumentError, "A CarrierWave::Uploader::Base object was expected") unless value.kind_of? CarrierWave::Uploader::Base
value = (options[:tokenizer] || DEFAULT_TOKENIZER).call(value) if value.kind_of?(String)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
a = 0 === this.length1 ? this.start1 + ",0" : 1 == this.length1 ? this.start1 + 1 : this.start1 + 1 + "," + this.length1;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
m = n == -v || n != v && j[l - 1] < j[l + 1] ? j[l + 1] : j[l - 1] + 1;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
b = 0 === this.length2 ? this.start2 + ",0" : 1 == this.length2 ? this.start2 + 1 : this.start2 + 1 + "," + this.length2;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
u = n == -v || n != v && i[l - 1] < i[l + 1] ? i[l + 1] : i[l - 1] + 1;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method indent_heading_level
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def indent_heading_level(markdown, heading_level, visual_heading_level = nil)
markdown.to_s.lines.map do |line|
line = line.rstrip # Remove all new line stuff (\n, \r)
if matches = line.match(/^([#]+)(.*)$/)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!(a[c].length1 <= b)) {
var d = a[c];
a.splice(c--, 1);
for (var e = d.start1, f = d.start2, g = ""; 0 !== d.diffs.length;) {
var h = new diff_match_patch.patch_obj,
Method complete_internal_references
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complete_internal_references(resource, attribute_name)
resource.send(attribute_name).to_s.lines.map do |line|
line.gsub!(/\[(.*?)\]\((@(.+?)-(.+?))\)/) do
caption = $1
url = $2
Function diff_cleanupSemanticLossless
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diff_match_patch.prototype.diff_cleanupSemanticLossless = function(a) {
function b(a, b) {
if (!a || !b) return 6;
var c = a.charAt(a.length - 1),
d = b.charAt(0),
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
else if (-1 == a[f][0] ? i = !0 : j = !0, e && (g && h && j && i || e.length < this.Diff_EditCost / 2 && 3 == g + h + j + i)) a.splice(c[d - 1], 0, [-1, e]), a[c[d - 1] + 1][0] = 1, d--, e = null, g && h ? (j = i = !0, d = 0) : (d--, f = 0 < d ? c[d - 1] : -1, j = i = !1), b = !0;
Function diff_lineMode_
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diff_match_patch.prototype.diff_lineMode_ = function(a, b, c) {
var d = this.diff_linesToChars_(a, b);
a = d.chars1;
b = d.chars2;
d = d.lineArray;
Function diff_bisect_
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diff_match_patch.prototype.diff_bisect_ = function(a, b, c) {
for (var d = a.length, e = b.length, f = Math.ceil((d + e) / 2), g = f, h = 2 * f, j = Array(h), i = Array(h), k = 0; k < h; k++) j[k] = -1, i[k] = -1;
j[g + 1] = 0;
i[g + 1] = 0;
for (var k = d - e, q = 0 != k % 2, r = 0, t = 0, p = 0, w = 0, v = 0; v < f && !((new Date).getTime() > c); v++) {
Function patch_make
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diff_match_patch.prototype.patch_make = function(a, b, c) {
var d;
if ("string" == typeof a && "string" == typeof b && "undefined" == typeof c) d = a, b = this.diff_main(d, b, !0), 2 < b.length && (this.diff_cleanupSemantic(b), this.diff_cleanupEfficiency(b));
else if (a && "object" == typeof a && "undefined" == typeof b && "undefined" == typeof c) b = a, d = this.diff_text1(b);
else if ("string" == typeof a && b && "object" == typeof b && "undefined" == typeof c) d = a;
Function patch_fromText
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diff_match_patch.prototype.patch_fromText = function(a) {
var b = [];
if (!a) return b;
a = a.split("\n");
for (var c = 0, d = /^@@ -(\d+),?(\d*) \+(\d+),?(\d*) @@$/; c < a.length;) {
Function match_bitap_
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
diff_match_patch.prototype.match_bitap_ = function(a, b, c) {
function d(a, d) {
var e = a / b.length,
g = Math.abs(c - d);
return !f.Match_Distance ? g ? 1 : e : e + g / f.Match_Distance
Method icon_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def icon_for(extension)
if ['zip', 'rar', '7z', '7zip', 'gzip'].include? extension
'file-archive-o'
elsif ['mp3', 'wav'].include? extension
'file-audio-o'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"