Showing 29 of 29 total issues
File stream.go
has 715 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package gfsmux
import (
"encoding/binary"
"io"
File session.go
has 709 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package gfsmux
import (
"container/heap"
"encoding/binary"
Method Session.recvLoop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Session,
) recvLoop() {
var hdr rawHeader
var updHdr updHeader
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Session.recvLoop
has 113 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Session,
) recvLoop() {
var hdr rawHeader
var updHdr updHeader
Method Stream.writeV2
has 95 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Stream,
) writeV2(
b []byte,
) (
Stream
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Stream struct {
id uint32
sess *Session
// slice heads kept for recycle
Session
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Session struct {
Conn io.ReadWriteCloser
Config *Config
nextStreamID uint32 // next stream identifier
Method Stream.writeV2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Stream,
) writeV2(
b []byte,
) (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Session.sendLoop
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Session,
) sendLoop() {
var buf []byte
var n int
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if len(
s.buffers,
) > 0 {
n = copy(
b,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if len(
s.buffers,
) > 0 {
n = copy(
b,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Stream.writeTov2
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Stream,
) writeTov2(
w io.Writer,
) (
Method Stream.tryReadv2
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (
s *Stream,
) tryReadv2(
b []byte,
) (
Function VerifyConfig
has 10 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func VerifyConfig(
Config *Config,
) error {
if !(Config.Version == 1 || Config.Version == 2) {
return errors.New(
Method Stream.writeV2
has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (
s *Stream,
) writeV2(
b []byte,
) (
Method Session.OpenStream
has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (
s *Session,
) OpenStream() (
*Stream,
error,
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if written, err := io.ReadFull(
s.Conn,
newbuf,
); err == nil {
s.streamLock.Lock()
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if stream, ok := s.streams[Sid]; ok {
stream.update(
updHdr.Consumed(),
updHdr.Window(),
)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
select {
case s.chAccepts <- stream:
case <-s.die:
}
Method Session.WriteFrameInternal
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (
s *Session,
) WriteFrameInternal(
f Frame,
deadline <-chan time.Time,