Showing 237 of 237 total issues
Function propFilter
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function propFilter( props, specialEasing ) {
var index, name, easing, value, hooks;
// camelCase, specialEasing and expand cssHook pass
for ( index in props ) {
Function make_holdouts
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def make_holdouts(
nodes: str,
edges: str,
output_dir: str,
train_fraction: float,
Function remove
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( owner, key ) {
var i,
cache = owner[ this.expando ];
if ( cache === undefined ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( support.matchesSelector && documentIsHTML &&
!nonnativeSelectorCache[ expr + " " ] &&
( !rbuggyMatches || !rbuggyMatches.test( expr ) ) &&
( !rbuggyQSA || !rbuggyQSA.test( expr ) ) ) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (activeElementType !== 'TEXTAREA' && activeElementType !== 'INPUT' && activeElementType !== 'SELECT'
&& !event.altKey && !event.ctrlKey && !event.metaKey && !event.shiftKey) {
switch (event.keyCode) {
case 37: // left
var prevHref = $('link[rel="prev"]').prop('href');
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"even": createPositionalPseudo( function( matchIndexes, length ) {
var i = 0;
for ( ; i < length; i += 2 ) {
matchIndexes.push( i );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"odd": createPositionalPseudo( function( matchIndexes, length ) {
var i = 1;
for ( ; i < length; i += 2 ) {
matchIndexes.push( i );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _gpi12iterator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _gpi12iterator(handle: TextIO) -> Generator:
# Partly cribbed from Biopython GPI 1.1 parser
# There is no GPI 1.2 parser yet, so I made this
"""Read GPI 1.2 format files (PRIVATE).
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(self, data_file: Optional[str] = None):
"""Run transform to ingest data from IntAct for viral/human PPIs."""
data_files = list()
if not data_file:
data_files.append(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse_chembl_activity
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_chembl_activity(self, data: List):
"""Parse ChEMBL Activity records.
An activity document links 4 entities,
- assay
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function access
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var access = function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) {
Function boxModelAdjustment
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function boxModelAdjustment( elem, dimension, box, isBorderBox, styles, computedVal ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if ( match[ 2 ] ) {
push.apply( results, context.getElementsByTagName( selector ) );
return results;
// Class selector
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ( ofType ?
node.nodeName.toLowerCase() === name :
node.nodeType === 1 ) &&
++diff ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (i = 0; i < otherterms.length; i++) {
if (haystack.indexOf(otherterms[i]) == -1) {
allfound = false;
break;
}
Function init
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function( elem, options, prop, end, easing, unit ) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( ( event.result = ret ) === false ) {
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for ( type in data.events ) {
if ( special[ type ] ) {
jQuery.event.remove( elem, type );
// This is a shortcut to avoid jQuery.event.remove's overhead
Function splitQuery
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function splitQuery(query) {
var result = [];
var start = -1;
for (var i = 0; i < query.length; i++) {
if (splitChars[query.charCodeAt(i)]) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ( newContext !== context || !support.scope ) {
// Capture the context ID, setting it first if necessary
if ( ( nid = context.getAttribute( "id" ) ) ) {
nid = nid.replace( rcssescape, fcssescape );