Showing 261 of 403 total issues
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function is_api_function. (6) Open
def is_api_function(node):
# API functions always have @rpc_method decorator
if not node.decorators:
return False
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method visit_call. (6) Open
def visit_call(self, node):
if node.func.as_string().endswith("Field") and node.keywords:
for keyword in node.keywords:
if keyword.arg == "label":
self.add_message("form-field-label-used", node=node)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function displayProperties
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function displayProperties (objectId, objectAttrName, viewMethod, removeMethod) {
const container = $('#properties-accordion')
const propertyTemplate = $('#property-fragment')[0].content
const valueTemplate = $(propertyTemplate).find('template')[0].content
const shownProperties = []
Function initializePage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function initializePage () {
table = $('#test-case-health-table').DataTable({
ajax: function (data, callback, settings) {
const query = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function loadBugs
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function loadBugs (selector, filter) {
const noRecordsFoundText = $('.bugs-table').data('no-records-found-text')
$(selector).DataTable({
ajax: (data, callback, settings) => {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
d3.select('.automated-bar')
.attr('aria-valuenow', `${automatedPercent}`)
.attr('title', `${count.automated} Automated`)
.style('width', `${automatedPercent}%`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
d3.select('.manual-bar')
.attr('aria-valuenow', `${manualPercent}`)
.attr('title', `${count.manual} Manual`)
.style('width', `${manualPercent}%`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (productIds && productIds.length) {
if (!Array.isArray(productIds)) {
productIds = [productIds]
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (versionIds && versionIds.length) {
if (!Array.isArray(versionIds)) {
versionIds = [versionIds]
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function quickSearchAndAddTestCase
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function quickSearchAndAddTestCase (objId, pageCallback, cache, initialQuery = {}) {
// + button
$('#btn-add-case').click(function () {
pageCallback(objId)
Function tree_view_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tree_view_html(self):
"""
Returns nested tree structure represented as Patterfly TreeView!
Relies on the fact that tree nodes are returned in DFS
order!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function preProcessData
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function preProcessData (data, callbackF) {
const caseIds = []
data.forEach(function (element) {
caseIds.push(element.id)
})
Function pageTestcasesMutableReadyHandler
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function pageTestcasesMutableReadyHandler () {
$('#id_template').change(function () {
window.markdownEditor.codemirror.setValue($(this).val())
})
Function ajax
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function (data, callbackF, settings) {
const query = {}
const productIds = $('#id_product').val()
if (productIds.length) {
Function pageTelemetryReadyHandler
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function pageTelemetryReadyHandler (pageId) {
initializeDateTimePicker('#id_before')
initializeDateTimePicker('#id_after')
const drawChart = {
Function getTestCaseRowContent
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getTestCaseRowContent (rowContent, testCase, permissions) {
const row = $(rowContent)
row[0].firstElementChild.dataset.testcasePk = testCase.id
row.find('.js-test-case-link').html(`TC-${testCase.id}: ${testCase.summary}`).attr('href', `/case/${testCase.id}/`)
Function pageTestplansGetReadyHandler
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function pageTestplansGetReadyHandler () {
const testPlanDataElement = $('#test_plan_pk')
const testPlanId = testPlanDataElement.data('testplan-pk')
const permissions = {
Function addLinkToExecutions
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function addLinkToExecutions (testExecutionIDs) {
// remove all previous event handlers
$('.add-hyperlink-form').off('submit')
// this handler must be here, because if we bind it when the page is loaded.
Function create_execution
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_execution( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments,too-many-positional-arguments
self,
case,
assignee=None,
build=None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function property_matrix
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def property_matrix(properties, _type="full"):
"""
Return a sequence of tuples representing the property matrix!
"""
property_groups = OrderedDict()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"